Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• RE-REPOST: JVOSTE.TXT part 2 of 2, Anonymous
• Re: JVOPLACE.TXT part 1 of 2, Anonymous
• Re: bridi, tanru and lujvo, Jim Carter
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: bridi, tanru and lujvo, Logical Language Group
• Re: CLD (was ro broda/ro lo broda), Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: CLD (was ro broda/ro lo broda), Logical Language Group
  • CLD (was ro broda/ro lo broda), ucleaar
• CLD, Steven M. Belknap
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: CLD, Logical Language Group
  • cld, Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: CLD, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: CLD, ucleaar
  • Re: CLD, Logical Language Group
  • Re: cld, John E. Clifford
  • Re: CLD, ucleaar
  • Re: CLD, Logical Language Group
  • Re: CLD, ucleaar
• besna kafke, Andrew Smith
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: besna kafke, Logical Language Group
• "except", Jorge J. Llambias
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: "except", Ivan A Derzhanski
  • Re: "except", Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: "except", Logical Language Group
  • Re: "except", ucleaar
  • Re: "except", Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: "except", ucleaar
• Re: cld (Jorge returns), Gerald Koenig
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: cld (Jorge returns), Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: cld (Jorge returns), Paulo Barreto
  • Re: cld (Jorge returns), Gerald Koenig
• Ping for JVOPLACE.TXT part 2 of 2, Anonymous
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Ping for JVOPLACE.TXT part 2 of 2, Iain Alexander
• brain fart metaphor, ucleaar
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: brain fart metaphor, Scott Brickner
  • Re: brain fart metaphor, ucleaar
  • Re: brain fart metaphor, Logical Language Group
  • Re: brain fart metaphor, ucleaar
  • Re: brain fart metaphor, Logical Language Group
  • Re: brain fart metaphor, ucleaar
  • Re: brain fart metaphor, Logical Language Group
  • Re: brain fart metaphor, ucleaar
    • Re: brain fart metaphor, Anonymous
  • Re: brain fart metaphor, ucleaar
  • Re: brain fart metaphor, ucleaar
• besna gaxykafke, Steven M. Belknap
• Re: PLI: "except", Goran Topic
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: PLI: "except", Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: "except", ucleaar
  • Re: PLI: "except", Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: PLI: "except", ucleaar
    • Some but not all (was: "except"), Anonymous
  • Re: PLI: "except", Logical Language Group
  • Re: PLI: "except", Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: "except", ucleaar
  • Re: PLI: "except", Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: "except", Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: "except", Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: PLI: "except", Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: PLI: "except", Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: PLI: "except", Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: PLI: "except", Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: "except", Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: "except", Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: "except", Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: "except", Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: PLI: "except", Chris Bogart
  • Re: PLI: "except", Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: "except", Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: "except", Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: PLI: "except", Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: PLI: "except", ucleaar
  • Re: PLI: "except", Chris Bogart
  • Re: PLI: "except", Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: "except", Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: "except", Chris Bogart
  • Re: PLI: "except", Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: "except", ucleaar
  • Re: PLI: "except", ucleaar
  • Re: PLI: "except", Jorge J. Llambias
• PLI: cau et al. (PU: Re: cld), Goran Topic
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: PLI: cau et al. (PU: Re: cld), Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: PLI: cau et al. (PU: Re: cld), Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: cau et al. (PU: Re: cld), Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: PLI: cau et al. (PU: Re: cld), Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: PLI: cau et al. (PU: Re: cld), Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: cau et al. (PU: Re: cld), Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: cau et al. (PU: Re: cld), Jorge J. Llambias
• my take on the lujvo paper, Logical Language Group
• language committee, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: language committee, Logical Language Group
  • language committee, Gerald Koenig
• {poo}, ucleaar
• FlashCards 1.8 available, Richard Kennaway
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: FlashCards 1.8 available, Richard Kennaway
• except, Steven M. Belknap
• Re: tech: logic matters, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: tech: logic matters, Iain Alexander
  • Re: tech: logic matters, Gerald Koenig
  • Re: tech: logic matters, Logical Language Group
  • Re: tech: logic matters, David Barton
  • Re: tech: logic matters, Jim Carter
  • tech: logic matters, ucleaar
  • Re: tech: logic matters, Logical Language Group
  • Re: tech: logic matters, ucleaar
  • Re: tech: logic matters, Logical Language Group
  • Re: tech: logic matters, ucleaar
  • Re: tech: logic matters, Veijo Vilva
  • Re: tech: logic matters, Jim Carter
• No Subject, Steven M. Belknap
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • No Subject, Steven M. Belknap
    • Politics, Anonymous
  • No Subject, Anonymous
• SNU: ko co'e bau la lojban. (PU: cld (Jorge returns)), Goran Topic
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: SNU: ko co'e bau la lojban. (PU: cld (Jorge returns)), Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: SNU: ko co'e bau la lojban. (PU: cld (Jorge returns)), Chris Bogart
  • Re: SNU: ko co'e bau la lojban. (PU: cld (Jorge returns)), Goran Topic
  • Re: SNU: ko co'e bau la lojban. (PU: cld (Jorge returns)), Chris Bogart
  • Re: SNU: ko co'e bau la lojban. (PU: cld (Jorge returns)), Goran Topic
  • Re: SNU: ko co'e bau la lojban. (PU: cld (Jorge returns)), Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: SNU: ko co'e bau la lojban. (PU: cld (Jorge returns)), Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: SNU: ko co'e bau la lojban. (PU: cld (Jorge returns)), Chris Bogart
  • Re: SNU: ko co'e bau la lojban. (PU: cld (Jorge returns)), Chris Bogart
• another FlashCard program available, Robert J. Chassell
• <lojban polti> JCB on change, Steven M. Belknap
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: <lojban polti> JCB on change, Logical Language Group
• CONLANG: Vocalic /r/, Harding, George E.
• Politics, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Politics, Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: Politics, Logical Language Group
• CONLANG: assorted topics, hrick
• Re: sera'aku le'ala'ezo JBO selsku, Scott Brickner
• brain fart, Steven M. Belknap
• <polti>, Steven M. Belknap
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: <polti>, Logical Language Group
  • Re: <polti>, Logical Language Group
• Re: tech: logic matters (rosu'o), Jim Carter
• loglan rapprochement orthography, ucleaar
  • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, Anonymous
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, ucleaar
    • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, Anonymous
  • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, Logical Language Group
  • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, ucleaar
    • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, John Cowan
    • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, Anonymous
  • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, Logical Language Group
  • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, ucleaar
  • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, ucleaar
  • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, Ivan A Derzhanski
  • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, Ivan A Derzhanski
    • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, John Cowan
  • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, Logical Language Group
  • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, Julian Pardoe LADS LDN X1428
  • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, ucleaar
  • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, Ivan A Derzhanski
  • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, Logical Language Group
  • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, Logical Language Group
  • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, Logical Language Group
  • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, Julian Pardoe LADS LDN X1428
  • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, ucleaar
  • Re: loglan rapprochement orthography, ucleaar
• lojban evolution, Steven M. Belknap
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: lojban evolution, Logical Language Group
  • Re: lojban evolution, ucleaar
  • Re: lojban evolution, Jim Carter
  • Re: lojban evolution, Logical Language Group
  • Re: lojban evolution, Logical Language Group
  • Re: lojban evolution, ucleaar
  • Re: lojban evolution, Logical Language Group
• existing ways to fuzz?, ucleaar
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: existing ways to fuzz?, ucleaar
  • Re: existing ways to fuzz?, Logical Language Group
• flood of messages coming, Logical Language Group
• pe'a & tanru, Andrew Smith
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: pe'a & tanru, Logical Language Group
  • Re: pe'a & tanru, ucleaar
• Strategies for acquiring a second language (from Fillmore), Anonymous
• CONLANG: Strategies for acquiring a second language (from Fillmore), John Cowan
• TECH: fuzzy logic proposals (NEW CMAVO), Anonymous
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: fuzzy logic proposals (NEW CMAVO), Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: fuzzy logic proposals (NEW CMAVO), ucleaar
  • Re: TECH: fuzzy logic proposals (NEW CMAVO), Logical Language Group
• Re: TECH: fuzzy logic proposals, Gerald Koenig
  • Re: TECH: fuzzy logic proposals, Anonymous
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: fuzzy logic proposals, Logical Language Group
• repost from a "newbie" who isn't, Logical Language Group
• Re: CONLANG: How many planned languages have there been?, Logical Language Group
• Re: TECH: fuzzy logic, Gerald Koenig
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: fuzzy logic, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: fuzzy logic, Gerald Koenig
  • Re: TECH: fuzzy logic, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: fuzzy logic, ucleaar
  • Re: TECH: fuzzy logic, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: fuzzy logic, ucleaar
• Re: tech: logic matters (CLD), Gerald Koenig
• you seem to not have subject lines in your posts, Logical Language Group
• steven on john's fuzz moot, ucleaar
  • Re: steven on john's fuzz moot, Anonymous
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: steven on john's fuzz moot, Logical Language Group
• *old response to and #1, Logical Language Group
• *old response to and #2, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • *old response to and #2, ucleaar
  • *old response to and #2, ucleaar
• *old response to And on fuzzy proposals, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: *old response to And on fuzzy proposals, ucleaar
  • Re: *old response to And on fuzzy proposals, ucleaar
  • Re: *old response to And on fuzzy proposals, Logical Language Group
  • Re: *old response to And on fuzzy proposals, ucleaar
  • Re: *old response to And on fuzzy proposals, Logical Language Group
  • Re: *old response to And on fuzzy proposals, ucleaar
  • Re: *old response to And on fuzzy proposals, Logical Language Group
• *old response to Steven B #2, Logical Language Group
• *old response to Steven B #3, Logical Language Group
• *old response to Steven B #4, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: *old response to Steven B #4, ucleaar
  • Re: *old response to Steven B #4, ucleaar
  • Re: *old response to Steven B #4, Logical Language Group
• *old response on "moskvas", Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: *old response on "moskvas", Logical Language Group
  • Re: *old response on "moskvas", Ivan A Derzhanski
  • Re: *old response on "moskvas", Ivan A Derzhanski
• *old response on "which logic", Logical Language Group
• *old response on LR(K), Logical Language Group
• *old response to Steven B on clani, Logical Language Group
• *old response onbuffer vowel, Logical Language Group
• *old response to djer., Logical Language Group
• *old response to Jorge, Logical Language Group
• *old response on xorvo, Logical Language Group
• *old response to paulo, Logical Language Group
• *old response to Colin Fine on re xirma, Logical Language Group
• *old response to Cyril on "hearsay", Logical Language Group
• *old response to Bob C. on e'a, Logical Language Group
• *old response on gismu baseline, Logical Language Group
• *old response on experienced Lojbanists, Logical Language Group
• *old response on kalte vs. sisku, Logical Language Group
• *old response on imperatives and the FAQ, Logical Language Group
• *old response on the net community as representative of LLG, Logical Language Group
• *old response on signs about grass, keeping off thereof, Logical Language Group
• *old response on y and apostrophe, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: *old response on y and apostrophe, ucleaar
  • Re: *old response on y and apostrophe, ucleaar
  • Re: *old response on y and apostrophe, Logical Language Group
• *old response to Steven B #1, Logical Language Group
• Re: VRC: <polti>, Goran Topic
• Re: PLI: brain fart metaphor, Goran Topic
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: PLI: brain fart metaphor, Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: brain fart metaphor, Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: brain fart metaphor, Goran Topic
• Re: VRC: CLD, Goran Topic
• Re: CONLANG: "real" languages, Chris Bogart
• Re: VRC: existing ways to fuzz?, Goran Topic
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: VRC: existing ways to fuzz?, Jim Carter
  • Re: VRC: existing ways to fuzz?, ucleaar
• Re: PLI: pe'a & tanru, Goran Topic
• Re: PLI: pe'a, Goran Topic
• Re: <fudji nibli>, Logical Language Group
• PLI: *cukta za'o nanmu (PU: *old response to and #1), Goran Topic
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • PLI: *cukta za'o nanmu (PU: *old response to and #1), ucleaar
  • PLI: *cukta za'o nanmu (PU: *old response to and #1), ucleaar
  • Re: PLI: *cukta za'o nanmu (PU: *old response to and #1), Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: *cukta za'o nanmu (PU: *old response to and #1), Logical Language Group
  • Re: PLI: *cukta za'o nanmu (PU: *old response to and #1), Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: *cukta za'o nanmu (PU: *old response to and #1), Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: PLI: *cukta za'o nanmu (PU: *old response to and #1), Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: *cukta za'o nanmu (PU: *old response to and #1), Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: PLI: *cukta za'o nanmu (PU: *old response to and #1), Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: *cukta za'o nanmu (PU: *old response to and #1), ucleaar
• SNU: leader?!? (PU: *old response to Steven B #4), Goran Topic
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: SNU: leader?!? (PU: *old response to Steven B #4), Logical Language Group
• Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Veijo Vilva
    • Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, John Cowan
      • Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, veion
  • Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Goran Topic
  • Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, ucleaar
  • Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, ucleaar
  • Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Logical Language Group
  • Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Goran Topic
  • Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Goran Topic
  • Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Goran Topic
  • Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Goran Topic
  • Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Logical Language Group
  • Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Goran Topic
  • Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Veijo Vilva
  • Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, John Cowan
  • Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Goran Topic
  • Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, ucleaar
  • Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, ucleaar
• Re: Existing ways to fuzz, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Existing ways to fuzz, ucleaar
  • Re: Existing ways to fuzz, Logical Language Group
• Only 6 months late: IRC log of session 1 from LogFest 95, Logical Language Group
• Only 6 months late: IRC log of session 2 )abortive) from LogFest 95, Logical Language Group
• Re: GEN: almoat-PROPOSAL: intervals, Veijo Vilva
• Re: GEN: *please* read: PROPOSAL: intervals, Goran Topic
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: GEN: *please* read: PROPOSAL: intervals, Goran Topic
  • Re: GEN: *please* read: PROPOSAL: intervals, ucleaar
  • Re: GEN: *please* read: PROPOSAL: intervals, Logical Language Group
• sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Don Wiggins
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Goran Topic
  • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Goran Topic
  • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Logical Language Group
    • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, John Cowan
  • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Goran Topic
  • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Logical Language Group
  • sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Don Wiggins
  • sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Don Wiggins
  • sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Don Wiggins
  • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Robert J. Chassell
    • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, John Cowan
      • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Robert J. Chassell
  • sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Don Wiggins
  • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Logical Language Group
  • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Logical Language Group
  • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Logical Language Group
  • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Logical Language Group
  • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Veijo Vilva
  • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Logical Language Group
  • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Logical Language Group
  • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Veijo Vilva
  • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Logical Language Group
  • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Goran Topic
  • Re: sera'aku GEN: almost-PROPOSAL: intervals, Colin Fine
• query: jvoterbri, Paulo Barreto
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: query: jvoterbri, Logical Language Group
• cue, ucleaar
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • cue, ucleaar
    • Re: cue, John Cowan
  • Re: cue, ucleaar
    • Re: cue, John Cowan
  • Re: cue, ucleaar
• gismu for <lojrfuzi>, Steven M. Belknap
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • gismu for <lojrfuzi>, Steven M. Belknap
  • Re: gismu for <lojrfuzi>, Logical Language Group
• Re: Clinton reference in book, Logical Language Group
• Re: PLI: gismu for <lojrfuzi>, Goran Topic
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: PLI: gismu for <lojrfuzi>, Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: gismu for <lojrfuzi>, Logical Language Group
  • Re: PLI: gismu for <lojrfuzi>, Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: gismu for <lojrfuzi>, Logical Language Group
  • Re: PLI: gismu for <lojrfuzi>, Steven M. Belknap
  • PLI: gismu for <lojrfuzi>, Steven M. Belknap
  • Re: PLI: gismu for <lojrfuzi>, Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: gismu for <lojrfuzi>, Goran Topic
  • Re: PLI: gismu for <lojrfuzi>, ucleaar
  • Re: PLI: gismu for <lojrfuzi>, Goran Topic
• Re: RET: jvoterbri, Goran Topic
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: RET: jvoterbri, Goran Topic
• doubleplusungood quality, Steven M. Belknap
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: doubleplusungood quality, Logical Language Group
• Why does Lojban make the world a better place?, David Barton
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Why does Lojban make the world a better place?, Mark A Biggar
  • Re: Why does Lojban make the world a better place?, Logical Language Group
• key to reading Women, Fire and Dangerous Things, Robert J. Chassell
• Re: TO PC ONLY, are you reading mail at all?, Logical Language Group
• Re: PLI: *cukta za'o nanmu, Don Wiggins
• Cowan denounces "je'a xi <number>", John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Cowan denounces "je'a xi <number>", ucleaar
    • Re: Cowan denounces "je'a xi <number>", John Cowan
  • Re: Cowan denounces "je'a xi <number>", ucleaar
  • Re: Cowan denounces "je'a xi <number>", Logical Language Group
• New versions of papers in FTP directory, Logical Language Group
• "except" found?, Jorge J. Llambias
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: "except" found?, ucleaar
  • Re: "except" found?, Jorge J. Llambias
  • Re: "except" found?, Chris Bogart
  • Re: "except" found?, ucleaar
• ADMIN: European mirror of the FTP archives, Veijo Vilva
• Permisssions fixed on lojbab's ftp site., Logical Language Group
• A Kill-All, Veijo Vilva
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: A Kill-All, Veijo Vilva
• CONLANG: 35,000+ English words by frequency, Jeffrey Henning
• Re[2]: Lojban BNF grammar inconsistency (fwd), Veijo Vilva
• papers, Logical Language Group
• Accents for apostrophes?, Chris Bogart
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Accents for apostrophes?, ucleaar
  • Re: Accents for apostrophes?, Ivan A Derzhanski
• SNU: litru mrikarda, Chris Bogart
• PLI: jo, Goran Topic
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: PLI: jo, Jorge J. Llambias
• Re: PLI: "except" found?, Goran Topic
• Re: PLI: co'emi'u, Goran Topic
• kamkuspe, Steven M. Belknap
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • kamkuspe, Steven M. Belknap
  • Re: kamkuspe, Jorge J. Llambias
• re "except" etc., John E. Clifford
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • re "except" etc., ucleaar
  • Re: re "except" etc., Logical Language Group
• Re: CONLANG: ASCII and ye shall receive!, KNAPPEN
• Apology - was Re: TECH: fuzzy logic, Logical Language Group
• Re: except, etc., John E. Clifford
• CHANGE PROPOSAL: terki restitution, ucleaar
  • Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: terki restitution, John Cowan
• tanru gerna srera, ucleaar
• {ti} (was: Re: *old response to And on fuzzy proposals), ucleaar
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: {ti} (was: Re: *old response to And on fuzzy proposals), Logical Language Group
  • Re: {ti} (was: Re: *old response to And on fuzzy proposals), ucleaar
• html and lojban, Steven M. Belknap
• Re: resolution of open Lojban issues - limited distributiuon message, Veijo Vilva
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: resolution of open Lojban issues - limited distributiuon message, Veijo Vilva
  • Re: resolution of open Lojban issues - limited distributiuon message, Logical Language Group
  • Re: resolution of open Lojban issues - limited distributiuon message, Logical Language Group
  • Re: resolution of open Lojban issues - limited distributiuon message, Logical Language Group
  • Re: resolution of open Lojban issues - limited distributiuon message, Logical Language Group
    • Re: resolution of open Lojban issues - limited distributiuon message, Veijo Vilva
• xelfanva and comments, Chris Bogart
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • xelfanva and comments, Logical Language Group
  • Re: xelfanva and comments, Chris Bogart
    • Re: xelfanva and comments, John Cowan
  • Re: xelfanva and comments, Logical Language Group
• Re: CONLANG: Novial, Bruce R. Gilson
• intemperate response to Lojbab on situation types, ucleaar
• short intemperate response to Lojbab on {duu}, ucleaar
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: short intemperate response to Lojbab on {duu}, Logical Language Group
• short response to Lojbab on {jai}, ucleaar
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: short response to Lojbab on {jai}, Chris Bogart
• short intemperate response to Lojbab on opacity, ucleaar
• very intemperate response to Lojbab on Fifafuban, ucleaar
• short response to Lojbab on discursives, ucleaar
• short intemperate response to Lojbab on {kea}, ucleaar
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: short intemperate response to Lojbab on {kea}, Chris Bogart
  • Re: short intemperate response to Lojbab on {kea}, ucleaar
• short intemperate response to Lojbab on aspectuals' syntax, ucleaar
• Re: intemperate response to Lojbab on situational types, Veijo Vilva
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: intemperate response to Lojbab on situational types, ucleaar
• delayed response on YACC LR(k) discussion - from Jeff Prothero, Logical Language Group
• fuzzy: use of <ni>, use of <jei>, need for <xoi>, Steven M. Belknap
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: fuzzy: use of <ni>, use of <jei>, need for <xoi>, Logical Language Group
  • Re: fuzzy: use of <ni>, use of <jei>, need for <xoi>, Steven M. Belknap
  • Re: fuzzy: use of <ni>, use of <jei>, need for <xoi>, Logical Language Group
• ADM: The Experimental Lojban List Database, Veijo Vilva
• ADM: Test database of Lojban List postings, Veijo Vilva
• ADM: Searchable Lojban List Archive on-line, Veijo Vilva
• searchable lojban list archive, Steven M. Belknap
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: searchable lojban list archive, Veijo Vilva
• Cognitive distortions and lojban, Steven M. Belknap
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Cognitive distortions and lojban, Peter L. Schuerman
• Tech: fuzzy: kamkuspe, Steven M. Belknap
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Tech: fuzzy: kamkuspe, Jorge J. Llambias
    • Re: Tech: fuzzy: kamkuspe, John Cowan
• Re: Cultural neutrality, Logical Language Group
• Re: Cognitive distortions into Lojban, Robert J. Chassell