Re: PLI: gismu for <lojrfuzi>

[Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>]

> > Yes, but we do not differentiate between kamkantu and kamselkantu in
> > gliban.
>
> Do we distinguish them in Lojban? After all, {ka kantu kei} means
> the same as {ka se kantu kei}; or is there some jvajvo convention
> that makes {kamkantu} = {ka kea kantu kei} and {kamselkantu} =
> {ka kea se kantu kei}? I suppose such a convention is a good idea,
> if you like jvajvo.

.i mi sruma da'i la'edi'u .i zo ke'a ka'e sumti lo sucta pezo ke fi roda
.iku'i va'o lenu ra goi ko'a nalselsku kei mi sruma ledu'u ko'a sumti fi
le pamoi be le'i nalselsku

(I would assume so. ke'a can be anywhere in a ka abstraction; but, when
I see ke'aless ka, I suppose that it fills the first unspecified
position)

co'o mi'e. goran.