cue

[ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>]

lojbab
> Otherwise, we have ALWAYS attempted to solve problems first by trying to
> adopt a solution using conventions upon hitherto unexplored grammatical
> usages.  Sometimes, we have added a cmavo to an existing selma'o.
> Almost never do we consider adding a selma'o (the current proposal ju'e
> is an example where we TRIED desperately to put the cmavo into an
> existing selma'o only to find that doing so raised more questions than
> it resolved, hence it rated a grammar change - BUT the lambda marker has
> been debated for *2 years* before we reached the point of accepting a
> grammar change.  I personally LIKE that kind of resistance to change.

The lambda marker could perfectly well have gone in KohA. But John
thought a new selmao was prettier. Well, that's okay, but it undermines
your point.

coo, mie and