Re: "will", "le mi..."

[John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>]

Lee Daniel Crocker (none) wrote:

> I was all prepared to explain why {le do djica} is not
> "what you desire" but "the desirer(s) associated with you",
> but I can't find in the refgram the explanation of the
> shortcut-possesives like {le mi karce}, etc. (though that
> particular example occurs in the chapter on relative clauses,
> while explaining something else).  I know I've seen those
> explained, but I just can't find it.

Chapter 8, Section 7 ("Possessive sumti")
<http://xiron.pc.helsinki.fi/lojftp/reference-grammar/chap8.html#s7>

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@ccil.org
			e'osai ko sarji la lojban