Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Re: [LANGDEV] Today's date: Citra (dlozj), kov (relh), Herman Miller
• Re: Problems with Abstraction, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Problems with Abstraction, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Problems with Abstraction, John Cowan
  • Re: Problems with Abstraction, Rick Nylander
  • Re: Problems with Abstraction, Rick Nylander
  • Re: Problems with Abstraction, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Problems with Abstraction, And Rosta
    • Re: Problems with Abstraction, John Cowan
  • Re: Problems with Abstraction, John Cowan
• "soi crano", John Cowan
• Re: Let's reopen the case...., Mark E. Shoulson
• Re: book on musical languages, And Rosta
• Your Amazon.com order (#7945-7084451-103569), orders@amazon.com for ; Thu, 13 Nov 1997 16:07:03 -0800 (PST)
• Re: Events & sisku [was: le/lo], John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Events & sisku [was: le/lo], John Cowan
  • Re: Events & sisku [was: le/lo], Chris Bogart
    • Re: Events & sisku [was: le/lo], John Cowan
  • Re: Events & sisku [was: le/lo], And Rosta
  • Re: Events & sisku [was: le/lo], JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: Events & sisku [was: le/lo], John Cowan
  • Re: Events & sisku [was: le/lo], John Cowan
  • Re: Events & sisku [was: le/lo], And Rosta
    • Re: Events & sisku [was: le/lo], Anonymous
  • Re: Events & sisku [was: le/lo], And Rosta
  • Re: Events & sisku [was: le/lo], JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: Events & sisku [was: le/lo], JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: Events & sisku [was: le/lo], Logical Language Group
  • Re: Events & sisku [was: le/lo], And Rosta
  • Re: Events & sisku [was: le/lo], Edward Cherlin
  • Re: Events & sisku [was: le/lo], JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: Events & sisku [was: le/lo], Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: Events & sisku [was: le/lo], Chris Bogart
  • Re: Events & sisku [was: le/lo], And Rosta
• Re: veridicality in English, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • veridicality in English, And Rosta
    • Re: veridicality in English, John Cowan
  • Re: veridicality in English, John Cowan
  • Re: veridicality in English, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: veridicality in English, And Rosta
    • Re: veridicality in English, John Cowan
  • Re: veridicality in English, And Rosta
  • Re: veridicality in English, John Cowan
  • Re: veridicality in English, And Rosta
  • Re: veridicality in English, And Rosta
  • Re: veridicality in English, Robin Turner
  • Re: veridicality in English, John Cowan
  • Re: veridicality in English, Robin Turner
  • Re: veridicality in English, And Rosta
  • Re: veridicality in English, And Rosta
• Re: book, Logical Language Group
• Book Announcement: _The Complete Lojban Language_, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Book Announcement: _The Complete Lojban Language_, Logical Language Group
• Re: Dr. Seuss and translating illogicality, Logical Language Group
• Re: le/lo, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: le/lo, Geoffrey Hacker
  • Re: le/lo, bob
    • Re: le/lo, John Cowan
  • Re: le/lo, Geoffrey Hacker
  • Re: le/lo, Geoffrey Hacker
  • Re: le/lo, Chris Bogart
  • Re: le/lo, Chris Bogart
  • Re: le/lo, bob
  • Re: le/lo, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: le/lo, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • le/lo, Logical Language Group
  • Re: le/lo, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • Re: le/lo, Logical Language Group
  • Re: le/lo, Robin Turner
  • Re: le/lo, And Rosta
    • Re: le/lo, John Cowan
  • Re: le/lo, And Rosta
  • Re: le/lo, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
    • Events & sisku [was: le/lo], John Cowan
  • Re: le/lo, Logical Language Group
  • Re: le/lo, And Rosta
  • Re: le/lo, And Rosta
    • Re: le/lo, John Cowan
  • Re: le/lo, And Rosta
  • Re: le/lo, And Rosta
  • Re: le/lo, John Cowan
  • Re: le/lo, Robin Turner
  • Re: le/lo, John Cowan
  • Re: le/lo, bob
  • Re: le/lo, Logical Language Group
  • Re: le/lo, And Rosta
  • Re: le/lo, And Rosta
  • Re: le/lo, bob
  • Re: le/lo, And Rosta
  • Re: le/lo, And Rosta
  • Re: le/lo, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: le/lo, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: le/lo, And Rosta
• book orders, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: book orders, Rick Nylander
  • Re: book orders, Chris Bogart
• Re: terminators, Lee Sau Dan ~{@nJX6X~}
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: terminators, Ivan A Derzhanski
  • Re: terminators, Lee Sau Dan ~{@nJX6X~}
  • Re: terminators, Robin Turner
  • Re: terminators, Ivan A Derzhanski
  • Re: terminators, Lee Sau Dan
  • Re: terminators, And Rosta
  • Re: terminators, And Rosta
• terminators and bilingualism, Robin Turner
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: terminators and bilingualism, And Rosta
  • Re: terminators and bilingualism, And Rosta
  • Re: terminators and bilingualism, Ivan A Derzhanski
  • Re: terminators and bilingualism, And Rosta
• Resources in Toronto + sound, Arlo Jeremy Gingerich
• bilingualism, John Hodges
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: bilingualism, Andrew Sieber
    • Message not available
      • Re: bilingualism, Andrew Sieber
      • Re: bilingualism, John Cowan
  • Re: bilingualism, Robin Turner
  • Re: bilingualism, John Cowan
• Re: What's going on here?, Chris Bogart
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: What's going on here?, Karen Stein
  • Re: What's going on here?, Karen Stein
  • Re: What's going on here?, Karen Stein
  • Re: What's going on here?, Logical Language Group
• Re: 'your will' as sumti, Chris Bogart
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: 'your will' as sumti, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: 'your will' as sumti, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • Re: 'your will' as sumti, Rick Nylander
  • Re: 'your will' as sumti, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • Re: 'your will' as sumti, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: 'your will' as sumti, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: 'your will' as sumti, Robin Turner
  • Re: 'your will' as sumti, Rick Nylander
  • Re: 'your will' as sumti, Rick Nylander
  • Re: 'your will' as sumti, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: 'your will' as sumti, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: 'your will' as sumti, David Barton
    • Re: 'your will' as sumti, John Cowan
  • Re: 'your will' as sumti, Logical Language Group
  • Re: 'your will' as sumti, Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: 'your will' as sumti, Rick Nylander
• Re: Linguistics journals, And Rosta
• Re: Kids learning Lojban, Ivan A Derzhanski
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Kids learning Lojban, John Hodges
  • Re: Kids learning Lojban, Logical Language Group
• seitu'a lo velrimni je pemci, Mark Vines
• Fwd: Dvorak (& Lojban), Karen Stein
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Dvorak (& Lojban), Karen Stein
• Beginner question: seitu'a lo velrimni je pemci, Rick Nylander
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Beginner question: seitu'a lo velrimni je pemci, Mark Vines
  • Re: Beginner question: seitu'a lo velrimni je pemci, Ivan A Derzhanski
  • Re: Beginner question: seitu'a lo velrimni je pemci, Mark Vines
  • Re: Beginner question: seitu'a lo velrimni je pemci, Logical Language Group
• Re: abstractors, And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: abstractors, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: abstractors, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
• Re: The design of Lojban, And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: The design of Lojban, Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: The design of Lojban, Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: The design of Lojban, Ivan A Derzhanski
• "will", "le mi...", Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • Re: "will", "le mi...", John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: "will", "le mi...", John Cowan
  • Re: "will", "le mi...", Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: "will", "le mi...", Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • Re: "will", "le mi...", Ashley Yakeley
• sei lu la .eim. li'u ti cmene, Mark Vines
• Re: mukti / djica, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: mukti / djica, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: mukti / djica, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: mukti / djica, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • Re: mukti / djica, Logical Language Group
  • Re: mukti / djica, Veijo Vilva
  • Re: mukti / djica, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: mukti / djica, Veijo Vilva
  • Re: mukti / djica, Logical Language Group
• Re: seitu'a lu la .eim. li'u, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • seitu'a lu la .eim. li'u, Mark Vines
    • Re: seitu'a lu la .eim. li'u, John Cowan
  • Re: seitu'a lu la .eim. li'u, John Cowan
• Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Robin Turner
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Rick Nylander
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Rick Nylander
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Rick Nylander
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, And Rosta
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Rick Nylander
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Rick Nylander
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Rick Nylander
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, And Rosta
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, And Rosta
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, And Rosta
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Rick Nylander
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, bob
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Chris Bogart
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Mark E. Shoulson
• A few questions/comments after 16 hours of study, Diane Trout
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: A few questions/comments after 16 hours of study, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
• Re: Hams, Mark E. Shoulson
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Hams, Karl Andrews
  • Re: Hams, Andrew Casson-du Mont
• Re: APL & Lojban, Mark E. Shoulson
• Re: dangling participles, Robin Turner
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: dangling participles, Logical Language Group
  • Re: dangling participles, Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: dangling participles, And Rosta
• la .eim., Mark Vines
• kau, And Rosta
  • Re: kau, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: kau, John Cowan
  • Re: kau, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: kau, And Rosta
  • Re: kau, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: kau, Logical Language Group
• Re: Sarcasm, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Sarcasm, Rick Nylander
  • Re: Sarcasm, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Sarcasm, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • Re: Sarcasm, And Rosta
  • Re: Sarcasm, And Rosta
  • Re: Sarcasm, Rick Nylander
• Book Ad Banner, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Book Ad Banner, And Rosta
  • Re: Book Ad Banner, Mark E. Shoulson
• Irony compared to Allegory, Ashley Yakeley
• Non-figurative lojban as a "style", Chris Bogart
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Non-figurative lojban as a "style", Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Non-figurative lojban as a "style", Logical Language Group
• The book is real!, Logical Language Group
• tu`a, And Rosta
  • Re: tu`a, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: tu`a, John Cowan
  • Re: tu`a, And Rosta
• pragmatics, And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: pragmatics, Robin Turner
  • Re: pragmatics, And Rosta
• gravity's rainbow, And Rosta
• Re: SWH (was Re: Linguistics journals), Mark E. Shoulson
• Re: A Problem with Abstractions, John E. Clifford
• `at least one ' vrs `one or more', bob
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', And Rosta
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', Thanatos
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', bob
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', bob
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', Thanatos
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', Erik Cornilsen
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', bob
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', Chris Bogart
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', Thanatos
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', Thanatos
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', Chris Bogart
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', bob
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', Thanatos
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', John E. Clifford
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', bob
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', Thanatos
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', Chris Bogart
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', John E. Clifford
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', And Rosta
  • Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more', Jim Carter
• do all nu's happen?, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: do all nu's happen?, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • Re: do all nu's happen?, And Rosta
  • Re: do all nu's happen?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: do all nu's happen?, And Rosta
  • Re: do all nu's happen?, And Rosta
• Events, Sisku, le, lo, Chris Bogart
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Events, Sisku, le, lo, Jim Carter
    • Re: Events, Sisku, le, lo, John Cowan
  • Re: Events, Sisku, le, lo, John Cowan
  • Re: Events, Sisku, le, lo, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
• Re: Indirect questions, Mark E. Shoulson
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Indirect questions, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: Indirect questions, And Rosta
  • Re: Indirect questions, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: Indirect questions, And Rosta
  • Re: Indirect questions, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
    • Re: Indirect questions, John Cowan
  • Re: Indirect questions, And Rosta
  • Re: Indirect questions, John Cowan
  • Re: Indirect questions, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: Indirect questions, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
    • Re: Indirect questions, John Cowan
  • Re: Indirect questions, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Indirect questions, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Indirect questions, And Rosta
  • Re: Indirect questions, And Rosta
  • Re: Indirect questions, And Rosta
  • Re: Indirect questions, John Cowan
  • Re: Indirect questions, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: Indirect questions, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: Indirect questions, And Rosta
  • Re: Indirect questions, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: Indirect questions, And Rosta
  • Re: Indirect questions, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: Indirect questions, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: Indirect questions, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: Indirect questions, And Rosta
  • Re: Indirect questions, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: Indirect questions, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Indirect questions, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Indirect questions, Mark E. Shoulson
• Re: FANVA, Mark E. Shoulson
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: FANVA, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
• Irony: {gerna}- & {javni}- Rules in the Language Definition, Ashley Yakeley
• Irony and the Baseline, Ashley Yakeley
• Irony and Cultural Neutrality, Ashley Yakeley
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Irony and Cultural Neutrality, Chris Bogart
  • Re: Irony and Cultural Neutrality, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Irony and Cultural Neutrality, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Irony and Cultural Neutrality, Jim Carter
  • Re: Irony and Cultural Neutrality, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Irony and Cultural Neutrality, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Irony and Cultural Neutrality, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Irony and Cultural Neutrality, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Irony and Cultural Neutrality, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Irony and Cultural Neutrality, Logical Language Group
• Irony: Necessity of Non-Verbal Communication with Lojban, Ashley Yakeley
• logflash software, Rick Nylander
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: logflash software, David Moore
  • Re: logflash software, Rick Nylander
  • Re: logflash software, Logical Language Group
  • Re: logflash software, Karen Stein
  • Re: logflash software, Logical Language Group
  • Re: logflash software, Karen Stein
• Clip art project, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
• Re: What is language?, And Rosta
• Using LogFlash, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Using LogFlash, Rick Nylander
  • Re: Using LogFlash, Logical Language Group
• lo`e, le`e, And Rosta
• More on lojban & language, And Rosta
• Re: Linguistics journals LONGISH, Mark E. Shoulson
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Linguistics journals LONGISH, Thanatos
• Re: What is Loglan/Lojban, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: What is Loglan/Lojban, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: What is Loglan/Lojban, And Rosta
• singular/plural (was: Re: veridicality in English), And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: singular/plural (was: Re: veridicality in English), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: singular/plural (was: Re: veridicality in English), And Rosta
• nu & fasnu, And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: nu & fasnu, And Rosta
• How {lo} works, bob
  • Re: How {lo} works, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: How {lo} works, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • Re: How {lo} works, John Cowan
  • Re: How {lo} works, Chris Bogart
• Re: logflash software and RE: Using LogFlash, Rick Nylander
• books status, Logical Language Group
• What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, And Rosta
    • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, John Cowan
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, And Rosta
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, And Rosta
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, John Cowan
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, Geoffrey Hacker
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, And Rosta
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, And Rosta
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, And Rosta
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, And Rosta
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, And Rosta
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, Chris Bogart
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, Chris Bogart
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, Chris Bogart
• zo and cmevla, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • Re: zo and cmevla, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: zo and cmevla, John Cowan
• still on nu & fasnu..., And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: still on nu & fasnu..., Logical Language Group
  • Re: still on nu & fasnu..., And Rosta
  • Re: still on nu & fasnu..., Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • Re: still on nu & fasnu..., Logical Language Group
  • Re: still on nu & fasnu..., Logical Language Group
• ni, jei, perfectionism, Chris Bogart
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, Chris Bogart
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
• No Subject, Steven Belknap
• Re: reply to And #1, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • reply to And #1, Logical Language Group
• Re: dacti, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: dacti, Chris Bogart
  • Re: dacti, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • dacti, Logical Language Group
  • Re: dacti, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
• Lojban discussions, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Lojban discussions, Ivan A Derzhanski
• try this again: Re: Irony and Cultural Neutrality, Logical Language Group
• Austin TX Lojbanists, Logical Language Group
• Digex web site, Logical Language Group
• Is Lojban important?, Robin Turner
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Is Lojban important?, Ashley Yakeley
• logical gaffs, Robin Turner
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: logical gaffs, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: logical gaffs, Ashley Yakeley
• Re: the dictionary on xiron (was: no subject), Veijo Vilva
• reply to And #2, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: reply to And #2, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: reply to And #2, Logical Language Group
• reply to And #3, Logical Language Group
• older reply to Ashley - not sure I posted this, Logical Language Group
• mapku, Logical Language Group
• reply to very old question, Logical Language Group
• keyboard (old reply), Logical Language Group