[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Summary so far on DJUNO
>> I don't think that is the issue. The issue is whether, if the founders
>> presuppose the truth, but >I< do not, whether >I< can say: "le finti cu djun
>> recognizing that they do, but without bringing myself and my beliefs into th
>--More--
>> predication at all.
>
>One can't say *anything* without "bringing oneself and one's beliefs
>into the predication" (I am assuming that that locution is defined by
>the example of the putative workings of djuno's x2). Or,
>alternatively, one can say everything without "bringing oneself and
>one's beliefs into the predication". There's nothing special about
>djuno.
djuno refers to the mental state of another, and hence I can report that mental
state without reference to my own mental state regarding the same subject.
If the discussion were about emotional states, this would not be in question.
We can report John feeling an emotion without feeling it ourselves. It is
only if we consider "knowedge" to be different - an absolute that is
independent of minds, and of epistemologies, that we assume that our own
menatla state has any relevance to reporting another's mental state.
Knowledge (at least se djuno in Lojban) has nothing to do with facts in the
absolute (fatci), and doesn't necessarily have to so with jetnu (truths that
may be stated so as to be observer-independent). It is only when we assume
an absolute reality consisting of objective facts, of which any person's
"knowledge" is a subset of these facts, that we can trulky say that knowledge
requires "truth". But we all seem to be agreeing that fatci is reltively
useless simply BECAUSEW there is little that is absolute fact, and we certainly
do not limit knolwedge to those things that are absolute facts. When we
overtly make clear that the context is subjective, the use of "know" to
reprt another's thinking does not imply anythimg about our own knolwedge or
belief. In English, however, subjective context is not the default, whereas
in Lojban it is.
lojbab