Re: more perversity (was Re: more epistemic perversity (wa

["Jorge J. Llambías" <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>]

Lojbab:
> As long as the debate is confined to English,
>then my intent has at least as much weight as anything else except the
>prescription (which is vague).

i le se casnu ba'e na se jimte le glico i mu'a la goran pu ca'a jinvi
bau la lojban i ku'i do toljundi lei se darlu pe bau la lojban

>The fact that they argue with me rather than simply agree to disagree
>suggests that somehow some amount of unclearness persists.
>("They" in this case being predominantly Jorge %^)

i li'a mi do tugni le du'u mi do toltugni

co'o mi'e xorxes