Re: Summary so far on DJUNO

["Erik W. Cornilsen" <thanatos@DIMENSIONAL.COM>]

I'm sorry if this muddies the waters further, but what would djuno mean
if any requirement of truth of the predication was divorced from x2?
With neither x1 nor the speaker required to believe in the truth or
falsity of x2?  It would seem to me that this would result in a
statement of knowledge of some subject with that knowledge produced by
some epistemology.

Whether anyone believes the predication of x2 to be true becomes another
matter, leaving simply a statement relating a predication, a subject, an
epistemology producing that predication, and the person(s) who is aware
of how that epistemology produced that predication relating to that
subject.  The only requirement on x2 is that it be produced by
x4.

All IMHO.  I'm just raising a point I don't recall having been raised
previously.

Thoughts?

--
Erik W. Cornilsen (who's taken too many philosophy courses)
thanatos@dimensional.com