Re: Summary so far on DJUNO

[John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>]

And Rosta wrote:

> A better comparison would be with {viska}, which necessarily involves
> the eyes or other visual organs, but has no syntactic sumti place for
> the eyes.

Well, not quite.  Some organism x1 might be able to see without
actually having a visual organ; it might have fully distributed visual
reception.  (I think this is actually true of some single-celled
creatures.)
 
-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@ccil.org
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (FW 16.5)