Re: Summary so far on DJUNO

["Jorge J. Llambías" <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>]

cu'u la kris
>>> Isn't it true that there's always
>>>an implied "fi'o selje'u zo'e" in every sentence: "with-metaphysics
>>> the-obvious"?
>
>Jorge:
>>In the same sense that there is an implied {cu'u zo'e}, an implied
>>{tecu'u zo'e}, etc.
>
>OK, and what about {bai zo'e}; is that always implied?

No! The speaker, the audience and the metaphysics are all
part of the background of language use. An enforcer of a given
relationship is not.

>That only makes
>sense if {zo'e} can stand for {noda} under appropriate circumstances.

No, I think {zo'e} cannot stand for {noda}. It would lead to very
weird results.

co'o mi'e xorxes