[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: names as predicates
- To: cbmvax!uunet!Think.COM!gls (Guy Steele)
- Subject: Re: names as predicates
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 91 11:15:09 EDT
- Apparently-From: snark!cowan
- In-Reply-To: <9106112229.AA09543@strident.think.com>; from "Guy Steele" at Jun 11, 91 6:29 pm
la gais. stil. (la glis.?) cusku di'e:
> I am not entirely convinced that distinguishing names and
> predicates is such a good idea after all. Is not a name merely a
> predicate that you are pretty sure happens to be satisfied by a
> single thing (whatever a "thing" is)?
For this purpose, the "me" particle was introduced into the language:
it turns an argument (often a name argument) into a predicate.
> I am Guy Steele.
> I am Guy-Steele-ish.
> I satisfy the Guy-Steele predicate.
> I have the Guy-Steele nature.
mi me la glis. (predicate version)
mi du la glis. (identity-sentence version)
mi'e glis. (non-predicative, self-vocative = "I hight GLS")
> I wish there were two Guy Steeles.
mi djica re da poi me la glis.
I desire two somethings which-are GLS-ish.
> Tina Turner has the Mick-Jagger nature.
la tinas. tr,nr. me la mik. djag,r.
> Fabian was Bobby-Darin-ish.
la feibi,n. pu me la babis. derin.
> Luciano-Pavarotti can Enrico-Caruso better than anyone else alive today.
la lutcian. pavarot. ne semau ro da poi cabna jmive prenu
cu xamgu me la .enrik. karus.
Luciano Pavarotti, more-than all those who-are (presently living) persons
is-a-good Enrico-Caruso-er.
--
cowan@snark.thyrsus.com ...!uunet!cbmvax!snark!cowan
e'osai ko sarji la lojban
- References:
- xebro
- From: <cbmvax!uunet!Think.COM!gls><gls@Think.COM>