[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Numeral strings: we need your help!
- To: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Raymond <eric@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Tiedemann <est@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
- Subject: Re: Numeral strings: we need your help!
- From: cbmvax!uunet!MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!nsn
- Date: Sat, 25 Jan 1992 10:42:30 +1100
- In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 24 Jan 92 12:41:14 EST."
- Reply-To: cbmvax!uunet!MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!nsn
- Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!LOJBAN>
I vote for your position on strings like repai.
I vote that {zei} be deallocated, and the space given to one of the currently
deallocated cmavo.
In contrast to your position on {repai}, though, and after initial opposition,
I do support the oddity {ropa}, and in general the concatenation of "adjective
PA" and "digit PA", for pragmatic reasons, even though {rolopa} is the
actual meaning (ropamei *is* handy; in fact, I came up with it independently;
it's a bad thing to have a backlog, friend). Similarly for du'e, mo'a etc.
As a whole Lojban's PA grammeme is an odd collection, with few analogies in
the world's languages. Forms like {ropa} are *not* obvious, and require
explanation in any presentation such as you're doing.
Nick.