[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
BAIbo grammar
- To: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Raymond <eric@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>, Eric Tiedemann <est@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
- Subject: BAIbo grammar
- From: CJ FINE <cbmvax!uunet!BRADFORD.AC.UK!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!C.J.Fine>
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1992 11:57:21 GMT
- Reply-To: CJ FINE <cbmvax!uunet!BRADFORD.AC.UK!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!C.J.Fine>
- Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!LOJBAN>
I am confused about the use of tags (sumti tcita) in contexts other than
terms.
I recall the following exposition in one of the textbook lessons:
ba le fasnu mi klama After the event, I go
baku mi klama After (something unspecified), I
go - Afterwards, I go
mi ba klama I after-the-current-reference-
point go
Not in that exposition, but consistently:
babo mi klama Then/next, I go
I therefore want to construct this paradigm:
ki'u le fasnu mi klama Because of the event, I go
ki'uku mi klama Because (of something unspecified),
I go - Therefore I go
mi ki'u klama I because of the-currently-
assumed-situation go - So I go
ki'ubo mi klama So I go.
But I observe various people using "seri'abo" and "seni'ibo" to mean
"therefore", and not "because".
What's going on?
kolin
c.j.fine@bradford.ac.uk