[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal (long)

To: Erik Rauch <erikr@MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU>
Subject: Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal (long)
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1993 01:22:36 EDT
Reply-To: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>

My intent was indeed "no'e" because it is the scalar neutral that has a rafsi
(as does na'e, etc.)  The CAI and NAI cmavo do not have rafsi.

lojbab

Prev by Date: Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal (long)
Next by Date: GENERAL: concerns of a new Lojbanist about Lojban List discussions
Prev by thread: Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal (long)
Next by thread: easy text revisions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread