Mail Index

• Thread Index

• Re: TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e"
  • From: hedgehog@SCRIPPS.EDU
• TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e"
  • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CTR.COLUMBIA.EDU>
• Re: TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e"
  • From: Mr Andrew Rosta <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e"
  • From: Iain Alexander <I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK>
• Re: non-specific SE
  • From: Iain Alexander <I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK>
• morphology algorithm test
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• Re: TECH: from Nora, again on xo'e
  • From: Iain Alexander <I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK>
• Two-level self-segregation
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
• Re: TECH: from Nora, again on xo'e
  • From: Iain Alexander <I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK>
• kliru
  • From: hedgehog@SCRIPPS.EDU
• Re: kliru
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• TECH: Problem - Morphology Algoirthm - Important/Urgent
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• Cowan on morphology
  • From: Mr Andrew Rosta <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: Cowan on morphology
  • From: Chris Handley <CHandley@GANDALF.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
• Re: Cowan on morphology
  • From: Mr Andrew Rosta <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: Cowan on morphology
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• Re: Cowan on morphology
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• TECH: more on morphology problem - some opionions
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• Re: Cowan on morphology
  • From: Mr Andrew Rosta <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: Cowan on morphology
  • From: Mr Andrew Rosta <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: Cowan on morphology
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• Re: self-segregating morphemes
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• Re: Cowan on morphology
  • From: Chris Handley <CHandley@GANDALF.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
• le'avla morphology
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: more on morphology problem - some opionions
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
• ?unt
  • From: Chris Handley <CHandley@GANDALF.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
• Re: TECH: more on morphology problem - some opionions
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• Re: Cowan on morphology
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• Re: TECH: more on morphology problem - some opionions
  • From: Iain Alexander <I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK>
• Re: TECH: more on morphology problem - some opionions
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
• how to say
  • From: fschulz@PYRAMID.COM
• TECH: non-specific SE - repost for Colin
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• TECH: more on xo'e
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• Re: how to say
  • From: Iain Alexander <I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK>
• Re: how to say
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
• Re: Cowan on morphology
  • From: Mr Andrew Rosta <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: Cowan on morphology
  • From: Mr Andrew Rosta <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: Cowan on morphology
  • From: Mr Andrew Rosta <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• munje
  • From: hedgehog@SCRIPPS.EDU
• how to say
  • From: fschulz@PYRAMID.COM
• TECH: Figurative speech: a minor change proposal
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
• how to say
  • From: fschulz@PYRAMID.COM
• John Hodges on "Why Lojban?"
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• John Hodges on "Why Lojban?"
  • From: Ivan A Derzhanski <iad@COGSCI.ED.AC.UK>
• how to say
  • From: Ivan A Derzhanski <iad@COGSCI.ED.AC.UK>
• self-segregating morphemes
  • From: Ivan A Derzhanski <iad@COGSCI.ED.AC.UK>
• self-segregating morphemes
  • From: Ivan A Derzhanski <iad@COGSCI.ED.AC.UK>
• Re: how to say
  • From: Rick Morneau <mnu@INEL.GOV>
• Re: self-segregating morphemes
  • From: Chris Handley <CHandley@GANDALF.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
• easy text
  • From: fschulz@PYRAMID.COM
• Re: how to say
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
• Re: how to say
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: easy text
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: Figurative speech: a minor change proposal
  • From: Mr Andrew Rosta <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: how to say
  • From: Rick Morneau <mnu@INEL.GOV>
• Re: easy text
  • From: jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU
• look thru window
  • From: fschulz@PYRAMID.COM
• dikni-tanru
  • From: fschulz@PYRAMID.COM
• look thru window
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• Re: how to say
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal (long)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• Re: John Hodges on "Why Lojban?"
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• Re: self-segregating morphemes
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• easy text revisions
  • From: fschulz@PYRAMID.COM
• response to one note by Frank Schulz - tanru place structures
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• Tech fix responses
  • From: david twery <dbt@CELLAR.ORG>
• Carl Sandburg poems
  • From: david twery <dbt@CELLAR.ORG>
• Re: TECH: more on morphology problem - some opionions
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal (long)
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: how to say
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: JimC on Frank's easy text
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: look thru window
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: dikni-tanru
  • From: jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU
• Re: how to say
  • From: jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU
• Metaphor in conlangs
  • From: Rick Morneau <mnu@INEL.GOV>
• Re: Colin on JimC on Frank's easy text
  • From: jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU
• Re: JimC on Colin on JimC on Frank's easy text
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal
  • From: jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU
• tanru place structure
  • From: fschulz@PYRAMID.COM
• Re: how to say
  • From: Chris Handley <CHandley@GANDALF.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
• Re: TECH: more on morphology problem - some opionions
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal (long)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• Re: lojbab doesn't like fi'o
  • From: jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU
• Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• rafsi baseline and pe'a
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• comments from Michael Helsem
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• rafsi baseline
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• No Subject
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• No Subject
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• No Subject
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• No Subject
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• No Subject
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• Re: TEXT.BEG easy text
  • From: Iain Alexander <I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK>
• Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• fi'o
  • From: fschulz@PYRAMID.COM
• Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• BTW lujvo wanted
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal
  • From: Chris Handley <CHandley@GANDALF.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
• Re: BTW lujvo wanted
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: Underwear (was: BTW lujvo wanted)
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• responses to Frank Schulz and Jeff Prothero (delayed)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• FAQ: LOGDATA.RAW format - what are rafsi, keyword, clue word
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• Re: FAQ: LOGDATA.RAW format - what are rafsi, keyword, clue word
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: JimC on Colin on JimC on Frank's easy text
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
• Re: lujvo-making algorithm
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
• Re: BTW lujvo wanted
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
• Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal (long)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
• Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal (long)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• GENERAL: concerns of a new Lojbanist about Lojban List discussions
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
• BTW lujvo wanted
  • From: Ivan A Derzhanski <iad@COGSCI.ED.AC.UK>
• Re: observatives (was JimC on Colin on ....... ad nauseam)
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>