Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Re: TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e", hedgehog
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e", Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e", Mr Andrew Rosta
  • Re: TECH: experimental cmavo "xo'e", Iain Alexander
• Re: non-specific SE, Iain Alexander
• morphology algorithm test, Logical Language Group
• Re: TECH: from Nora, again on xo'e, Iain Alexander
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: from Nora, again on xo'e, Iain Alexander
• Two-level self-segregation, John Cowan
• kliru, hedgehog
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: kliru, Logical Language Group
• TECH: Problem - Morphology Algoirthm - Important/Urgent, Logical Language Group
• Cowan on morphology, Mr Andrew Rosta
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Cowan on morphology, Chris Handley
  • Re: Cowan on morphology, Mr Andrew Rosta
  • Re: Cowan on morphology, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Cowan on morphology, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Cowan on morphology, Mr Andrew Rosta
  • Re: Cowan on morphology, Mr Andrew Rosta
  • Re: Cowan on morphology, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Cowan on morphology, Chris Handley
  • Re: Cowan on morphology, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Cowan on morphology, Mr Andrew Rosta
  • Re: Cowan on morphology, Mr Andrew Rosta
  • Re: Cowan on morphology, Mr Andrew Rosta
• TECH: more on morphology problem - some opionions, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: more on morphology problem - some opionions, John Cowan
  • Re: TECH: more on morphology problem - some opionions, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: more on morphology problem - some opionions, Iain Alexander
  • Re: TECH: more on morphology problem - some opionions, John Cowan
  • Re: TECH: more on morphology problem - some opionions, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: more on morphology problem - some opionions, Logical Language Group
• Re: self-segregating morphemes, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • self-segregating morphemes, Ivan A Derzhanski
  • self-segregating morphemes, Ivan A Derzhanski
  • Re: self-segregating morphemes, Chris Handley
  • Re: self-segregating morphemes, Logical Language Group
• le'avla morphology, Colin Fine
• ?unt, Chris Handley
• how to say, fschulz
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: how to say, Iain Alexander
  • Re: how to say, John Cowan
  • how to say, fschulz
  • how to say, fschulz
  • how to say, Ivan A Derzhanski
  • Re: how to say, Rick Morneau
  • Re: how to say, John Cowan
  • Re: how to say, Colin Fine
  • Re: how to say, Rick Morneau
  • Re: how to say, Logical Language Group
  • Re: how to say, Colin Fine
  • Re: how to say, jimc
  • Re: how to say, Chris Handley
• TECH: non-specific SE - repost for Colin, Logical Language Group
• TECH: more on xo'e, Logical Language Group
• munje, hedgehog
• TECH: Figurative speech: a minor change proposal, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: Figurative speech: a minor change proposal, Mr Andrew Rosta
• John Hodges on "Why Lojban?", Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • John Hodges on "Why Lojban?", Ivan A Derzhanski
  • Re: John Hodges on "Why Lojban?", Logical Language Group
• easy text, fschulz
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: easy text, Colin Fine
  • Re: easy text, jimc
• look thru window, fschulz
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • look thru window, bob
  • Re: look thru window, Colin Fine
• dikni-tanru, fschulz
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: dikni-tanru, jimc
• TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal (long), Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal (long), Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal (long), Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal (long), John Cowan
  • Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal (long), Logical Language Group
• easy text revisions, fschulz
• response to one note by Frank Schulz - tanru place structures, Logical Language Group
• Tech fix responses, david twery
• Carl Sandburg poems, david twery
• Re: JimC on Frank's easy text, Colin Fine
• Metaphor in conlangs, Rick Morneau
• Re: Colin on JimC on Frank's easy text, jimc
• Re: JimC on Colin on JimC on Frank's easy text, Colin Fine
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: JimC on Colin on JimC on Frank's easy text, John Cowan
• Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal, jimc
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: pe'a/po'a proposal, Chris Handley
• tanru place structure, fschulz
• Re: lojbab doesn't like fi'o, jimc
• rafsi baseline and pe'a, Logical Language Group
• comments from Michael Helsem, Logical Language Group
• rafsi baseline, Logical Language Group
• No Subject, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • No Subject, Logical Language Group
  • No Subject, Logical Language Group
  • No Subject, Logical Language Group
  • No Subject, Logical Language Group
• Re: TEXT.BEG easy text, Iain Alexander
• fi'o, fschulz
• BTW lujvo wanted, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: BTW lujvo wanted, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: BTW lujvo wanted, John Cowan
  • BTW lujvo wanted, Ivan A Derzhanski
• Re: Underwear (was: BTW lujvo wanted), Colin Fine
• responses to Frank Schulz and Jeff Prothero (delayed), Logical Language Group
• FAQ: LOGDATA.RAW format - what are rafsi, keyword, clue word, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: FAQ: LOGDATA.RAW format - what are rafsi, keyword, clue word, Colin Fine
• Re: lujvo-making algorithm, John Cowan
• GENERAL: concerns of a new Lojbanist about Lojban List discussions, Logical Language Group
• Re: observatives (was JimC on Colin on ....... ad nauseam), Colin Fine