mi'e .djan. .i la nik. cusku di'e
> Lojbab was right about the grammar of it: it's ta'i tu'a ti .enai ta, or
> ta'i tu'a ti lu'u .enai tu'a ta
Right. I had forgotten the grammar change for LAhE, making it take a whole
sumti following.
--
John Cowan sharing account <lojbab@access.digex.net> for now
e'osai ko sarji la lojban.