Mail Index

• Thread Index

• old response to And - Lojban and humor
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• documentation on LogFlash now on ftp server
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: possible sumti-raising place structures of the sisku variety
  • From: Iain Alexander <I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK>
• TEXT: The Terrifying Adventure.3
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Ed de jour-ing for Jorge
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• John Hodges introductory piece posted a couple weeks ago.
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• TEXT: A card from Andrew
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• clitoris
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Ed de jour-ing for Jorge
  • From: John Cowan <snark!cowan@VFL.PARAMAX.COM>
• Re: clitoris
  • From: jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU
• Re: clitoris
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: clitoris
  • From: Richard Kennaway <jrk@SYS.UEA.AC.UK>
• ADMIN: monthly posting
  • From: John Cowan <snark!cowan@VFL.PARAMAX.COM>
• Re: clitoris
  • From: John Cowan <snark!cowan@VFL.PARAMAX.COM>
• overseas JLs mailed
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Lojfest - imminent
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: TEXT: A card from Andrew
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• SNePS-2.1 (Rev. 1.400) released under the terms of the GNU GPL
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GRACKLE.STOCKBRIDGE.MA.US>
• clitoris
  • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CTR.COLUMBIA.EDU>
• TEXT.INT: pelxi ni'ablo
  • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CTR.COLUMBIA.EDU>
• new material on ftp server
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: clitoris (and associated sexual organs)
  • From: C_Burke%SEMPERFI@MWMGATE1.MITRE.ORG
• vagina (offshoot of clitoris thread)
  • From: C_Burke%SEMPERFI@MWMGATE1.MITRE.ORG
• Personal to John Cowan
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: TEXT.INT: pelxi ni'ablo
  • From: Iain Alexander <I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK>
• TEXT.INT: pelxi ni'ablo
  • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CTR.COLUMBIA.EDU>
• Re: Converted gismu (was: TEXT.INT: pelxi ni'ablo)
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• TECH: Submultiples of local units
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: Submultiples of local units
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• response on lujvo-making
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• TECH: input on gismu place structures wanted - sumti raising?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• TECH: a very few lujvo
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: TECH: a very few lujvo
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: Submultiples of local unitsRe: TECH: a very few lujvo
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Eaton: You asked for it ...
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• TECH: a very few lujvo
  • From: fschulz@PYRAMID.COM
• Re: TECH: a very few lujvo
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: TECH: a very few lujvo
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: a very few lujvo
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Eaton: You asked for it ...
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Eaton: You asked for it ...
  • From: fschulz@PYRAMID.COM
• Re: Eaton: You asked for it ...
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: TECH: input on gismu place structures wanted - sumti raising?
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: Eaton: You asked for it ...
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: TECH: a very few lujvo
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Eaton: You asked for it ...
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: input on gismu place structures wanted - sumti raising?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• repost of my response to Nick of last month
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Eaton: You asked for it ...
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• use "lojbau" not "lojban"
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: jbobau (Was: use "lojbau" not "lojban")
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: input on gismu place structures wanted - sumti raising?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: input on gismu place structures
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: jbobau (Was: use "lojbau" not "lojban")
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: Eaton: You asked for it ...
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Eaton: You asked for it ...
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: use "lojbau" not "lojban"
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: jbobau (Was: use "lojbau" not "lojban")
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Eaton: You asked for it ...
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• response to John(lojbab) on sarcu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• TECH: Two non-English based lujvo requests
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• GEN: Ed de jour concept as I see it
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: Eaton: You asked for it ...
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Eaton: You asked for it ...
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: Two non-English based lujvo requests
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: Two non-English based lujvo requests
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: Two non-English based lujvo requests
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: GEN: Ed de jour concept as I see it
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: Two non-English based lujvo requests
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Eaton: You asked for it ...
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: GEN: Ed de jour concept as I see it
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: repost of my response to Nick of last month
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: TECH: Two non-English based lujvo requests
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: Eaton: You asked for it ...
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: Two non-English based lujvo requests
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• TECH: local unit gismu, hierarchical place structures
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: local units, species hierarchy
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: local unit gismu, hierarchical place structures
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: local units
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: local units, species hierarchy
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• more Eaton, anyone?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• GEN: Nick incommunicado during October
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• TECH: Two non-English based lujvo requests
  • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CTR.COLUMBIA.EDU>
• Re: Subcategorisation (Was :response to John(lojbab) on sarcu)
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: degrees vrs radians
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: local units
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• New "jutsi" (species) proposal
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Subcategorisation (Was :response to John(lojbab) on sarcu)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: New "jutsi" (species) proposal
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: local units
  • From: Chris Handley <CHandley@GANDALF.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Chris Handley <CHandley@GANDALF.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
• Re: TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: local units
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Subcategorisation
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Essay on Subcategorization
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: local units
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: local units
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: deleting places
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU>
• Re: local units
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• >6 place brivla
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: >6 place brivla
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: deleting places
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: local units
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: deleting places
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: deleting places
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: deleting places
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: deleting places
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: deleting places
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: deleting places
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: >6 place brivla, fat gismu, deleting ...
  • From: Jon Wolfe <wolfe@GBORO.ROWAN.EDU>
• Re: local units
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• No Subject
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• No Subject
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: vehicle/means places on various gismu, litru vs. klama
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU
• Re: deleting places
  • From: jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU
• litru and klama
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: vehicle/means places on various gismu, litru vs. klama
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Iain Alexander <I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK>
• No Subject
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: means/vehicle
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: means/vehicle
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• coming and going
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: means/vehicle
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: means/vehicle
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CTR.COLUMBIA.EDU>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Iain Alexander <I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Iain Alexander <I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK>
• Re: means/vehicle
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Iain Alexander <I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• more on fat gismu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: more on fat gismu
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: more on fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Iain Alexander <I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Iain Alexander <I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK>
• Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Iain Alexander <I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK>
• Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU
• Re: more on fat gismu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• TEXT: toldi nunsenva
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: more on fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: more on fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: more on fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: more on fat gismu
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: more on fat gismu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Lojban to TLI Loglan correspondences available on ftp
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: more on fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• TECH: muvdu place structure
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• TECH: jarco place structure
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• TECH: misc transitive place structure issues
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• PHILOSOPHY/TECH: place structures and metaphysical parsimony
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TEXT: toldi nunsenva
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: TEXT: toldi nunsenva
  • From: Iain Alexander <I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK>
• Re: TECH: muvdu place structure
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: TECH: jarco place structure
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: TECH: misc transitive place structure issues
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: TECH: muvdu place structure
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: more on fat gismu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TEXT: toldi nunsenva
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: misc transitive place structure issues
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• TECH: deagentive place structures
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: PHILOSOPHY/TECH: place structures and metaphysical parsimony
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: deagentive place structures
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: TEXT: toldi nunsenva
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: TECH: misc transitive place structure issues
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: deagentive place structures
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: deagentive place structures
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• news from TLI (colored by the Lojban point-of-view)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• rely
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: news from TLI (colored by the Lojban point-of-view)
  • From: Bruce Gilson <EZ-as-pi@CUP.PORTAL.COM>
• Re: rely
  • From: Bruce Gilson <EZ-as-pi@CUP.PORTAL.COM>
• Re: rely
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: news from TLI (colored by the Lojban point-of-view)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Intransitives
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: rely
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: deagentive place structures
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Some questions about the text
  • From: Glyn Gowing <querist@BIX.COM>
• Re: rely
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: deagentive place structures
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Some questions about the text
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• ADMIN: Charge cards
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• ADMIN: New Lojban Parser Policy - Parser available on ftp
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• LEXICON: Programming jargon
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: ADMIN: Charge cards
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: ADMIN: Charge cards
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva)
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva)
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva)
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• ADMIN: Lojban parser available, FTP site reorganized
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva)
  • From: Chris Handley <CHandley@GANDALF.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
• Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva)
  • From: Chris Handley <CHandley@GANDALF.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
• Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva)
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva)
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?
  • From: jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU
• Possible problem with Lojban parser source
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Compiling the Lojban parser
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GRACKLE.STOCKBRIDGE.MA.US>
• Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Event contours and ZAhO tcita
  • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CTR.COLUMBIA.EDU>
• Converse of tu'a/ demonstratives
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: Converse of tu'a/ demonstratives
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Animal gaits
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: Event contours and ZAhO tcita
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: "science" defined
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GRACKLE.STOCKBRIDGE.MA.US>
• TECH: nested bridi anaphora
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• TEXT: ze skami se finti lisri
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• TECH: Topic constructions and prenexes
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: Event contours and ZAhO tcita
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: nested bridi anaphora
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: Topic constructions and prenexes
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: nested bridi anaphora
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• beginner questions: the lord's prayer
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@CSN.ORG>
• beginner question: the lord's prayer
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@CSN.ORG>
• Re: beginner questions: the lord's prayer
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• TECH: lujvo : tutuear
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• response to And - old posting culture-specifcity
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: nested bridi anaphora
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• TECH: panra/simsa
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: lujvo : tutuear
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• TEXT: Lojbab bau la lojban .ue
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• TECH: more on panra and only
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: nested bridi anaphora
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• TECH: query re. jvajvo for "nu zei broda"
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: panra/simsa
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GRACKLE.STOCKBRIDGE.MA.US>
• Re: TECH: query re. jvajvo for "nu zei broda"
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: muvdu place structure
  • From: Iain Alexander <I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK>
• Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: {cikre} as fat gismu
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GRACKLE.STOCKBRIDGE.MA.US>
• Re: {sorcu} definition
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GRACKLE.STOCKBRIDGE.MA.US>
• Re: PHILOSOPHY/TECH: place structures and metaphysical parsimony
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GRACKLE.STOCKBRIDGE.MA.US>
• Re: TEXT: Lojbab bau la lojban .ue
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: TEXT: Lojbab bau la lojban .ue
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: {cikre} as fat gismu
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: {sorcu} definition
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: panra/simsa
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: TEXT: Lojbab bau la lojban .ue
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: {cikre} as fat gismu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language
  • From: Matthew Faupel <matthew@CPDAPO.TELE.NOKIA.FI>
• Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: TEXT: Lojbab bau la lojban .ue
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Long 5-parter coming
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• No Subject
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• No Subject
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• No Subject
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• No Subject
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• No Subject
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• TECH: My semantics essay
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• sorry about unnumbered postings.
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: {sorcu} definition
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GRACKLE.STOCKBRIDGE.MA.US>
• Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• TECH.LING: Lojban glottochronology
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: {sorcu} definition
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• TECH: more thoughts on zi'o
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: {sorcu} definition
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o
  • From: Richard Kennaway <jrk@SYS.UEA.AC.UK>
• TECH: more thoughts on zi'o
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GRACKLE.STOCKBRIDGE.MA.US>
• Re: {sorcu} definition
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GRACKLE.STOCKBRIDGE.MA.US>
• Re: {sorcu} definition
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: {sorcu} definition
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GRACKLE.STOCKBRIDGE.MA.US>
• GEN: Nick back on line
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o
  • From: Richard Kennaway <jrk@SYS.UEA.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: {sorcu} definition
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH.LING: Lojban glottochronology
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o
  • From: jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU
• Re: {sorcu} definition
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• re'enai
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• TECH: more thoughts on zi'o
  • From: Ivan A Derzhanski <iad@COGSCI.EDINBURGH.AC.UK>
• Re: re'enai
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: re'enai
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: re'enai
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: another new query (ketco)
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: re'enai
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: more Eaton, anyone?
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Eaton
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: more Eaton, anyone?
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: re'enai
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: more Eaton, anyone?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• TECH: proposed new rVV attitudinal classifier
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• TECH: re'enai and the emotion classifiers (long)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• sprituality; new cmavo
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: more Eaton, anyone?
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: re'enai and the emotion classifiers (long)
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: re'e
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GRACKLE.STOCKBRIDGE.MA.US>
• Re: TECH: re'enai and the emotion classifiers (long)
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: re'enai and the emotion classifiers (long)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: re'enai and the emotion classifiers (long)
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: TECH: re'enai and the emotion classifiers (long)
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: TECH: re'enai and the emotion classifiers (long)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: re'enai and the emotion classifiers (long)
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: TECH: re'enai and the emotion classifiers (long)
  • From: Art Protin <protin@USL.COM>
• Re: Eaton: You asked for it ...
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: Eaton
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: more Eaton, anyone?
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: Eaton: You asked for it ...
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: more Eaton, anyone?
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Eaton
  • From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• TEXT: This Is the Title of This Story...
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: more Eaton, anyone?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: more Eaton, anyone?
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU>
• Re: more Eaton, anyone?
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: more Eaton, anyone?
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: more Eaton, anyone?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: more Eaton, anyone?
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• response on old posting - lujvo-making TECH/PHILOSOPHY (long)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• another response on old posting - lujvo-making
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TEXT: This Is the Title of This Story...
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: response on old posting - lujvo-making TECH/PHILOSOPHY (long)
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: response on old posting - lujvo-making TECH/PHILOSOPHY (long)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: dog-house for lapdogs
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GRACKLE.STOCKBRIDGE.MA.US>
• proposal for new member of SE
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: proposal for new member of SE
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: response on old posting - lujvo-making TECH/PHILOSOPHY (long)
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: proposal for new member of SE
  • From: David Eric Young <fred@WAM.UMD.EDU>
• Re: proposal for new member of SE
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: proposal for new member of SE
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• TECH: tu'e/tu'u
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: proposal for new member of SE
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: proposal for new member of SE
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: proposal for new member of SE
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• ADMIN: draft textbook available by anon FTP
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• better formatted lessons
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GRACKLE.STOCKBRIDGE.MA.US>
• Re: proposal for new member of SE
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: proposal for new member of SE
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: proposal for new member of SE
  • From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
• Re: proposal for new member of SE
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: proposal for new member of SE
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: proposal for new member of SE
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• TEXT: le firgai be la xunrynunmorsi
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• response to your technical questions from last month
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Change of Address Notification
  • From: Nick NICHOLAS <nsn@VIS.MU.OZ.AU>
• No Subject
  • From: "Dr. C.D. Wright" <cdw10@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK>
• The return of the ZAhO
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: your mail
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>