Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• old response to And - Lojban and humor, Logical Language Group
• documentation on LogFlash now on ftp server, Logical Language Group
• Re: possible sumti-raising place structures of the sisku variety, Iain Alexander
• TEXT: The Terrifying Adventure.3, Jorge LLambias
• Ed de jour-ing for Jorge, Nick Nicholas
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Ed de jour-ing for Jorge, John Cowan
• John Hodges introductory piece posted a couple weeks ago., Logical Language Group
• TEXT: A card from Andrew, Colin Fine
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TEXT: A card from Andrew, Nick Nicholas
• clitoris, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: clitoris, jimc
  • Re: clitoris, Art Protin
  • Re: clitoris, Richard Kennaway
  • Re: clitoris, John Cowan
  • clitoris, Mark E. Shoulson
• ADMIN: monthly posting, John Cowan
• overseas JLs mailed, Logical Language Group
• Lojfest - imminent, Colin Fine
• SNePS-2.1 (Rev. 1.400) released under the terms of the GNU GPL, Robert J. Chassell
• TEXT.INT: pelxi ni'ablo, Mark E. Shoulson
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TEXT.INT: pelxi ni'ablo, Iain Alexander
  • TEXT.INT: pelxi ni'ablo, Mark E. Shoulson
• new material on ftp server, Logical Language Group
• Re: clitoris (and associated sexual organs), C_Burke%SEMPERFI
• vagina (offshoot of clitoris thread), C_Burke%SEMPERFI
• Personal to John Cowan, Nick Nicholas
• Re: Converted gismu (was: TEXT.INT: pelxi ni'ablo), Colin Fine
• TECH: Submultiples of local units, Colin Fine
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: Submultiples of local units, Jorge LLambias
• response on lujvo-making, Logical Language Group
• TECH: input on gismu place structures wanted - sumti raising?, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: input on gismu place structures wanted - sumti raising?, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: input on gismu place structures wanted - sumti raising?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: input on gismu place structures wanted - sumti raising?, Logical Language Group
• TECH: a very few lujvo, Nick Nicholas
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: a very few lujvo, Colin Fine
  • TECH: a very few lujvo, fschulz
  • Re: TECH: a very few lujvo, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: a very few lujvo, Colin Fine
  • Re: TECH: a very few lujvo, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TECH: a very few lujvo, Logical Language Group
• Re: TECH: Submultiples of local unitsRe: TECH: a very few lujvo, Logical Language Group Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Eaton: You asked for it ..., Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Eaton: You asked for it ..., Jorge LLambias
  • Re: Eaton: You asked for it ..., fschulz
  • Re: Eaton: You asked for it ..., Nick Nicholas
  • Re: Eaton: You asked for it ..., Nick Nicholas
  • Re: Eaton: You asked for it ..., Logical Language Group
  • Re: Eaton: You asked for it ..., Nick Nicholas
  • Re: Eaton: You asked for it ..., Jorge Llambias
  • Re: Eaton: You asked for it ..., Logical Language Group
  • Re: Eaton: You asked for it ..., Logical Language Group
  • Re: Eaton: You asked for it ..., Jorge LLambias
  • Re: Eaton: You asked for it ..., Jorge LLambias
  • Re: Eaton: You asked for it ..., Logical Language Group
  • Re: Eaton: You asked for it ..., Jorge LLambias
  • Re: Eaton: You asked for it ..., Nick Nicholas
  • Re: Eaton: You asked for it ..., Jorge LLambias
• repost of my response to Nick of last month, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: repost of my response to Nick of last month, Nick Nicholas
• use "lojbau" not "lojban", ucleaar
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: use "lojbau" not "lojban", Logical Language Group
• Re: jbobau (Was: use "lojbau" not "lojban"), Colin Fine
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: jbobau (Was: use "lojbau" not "lojban"), ucleaar
  • Re: jbobau (Was: use "lojbau" not "lojban"), Logical Language Group
• Re: TECH: input on gismu place structures, Logical Language Group
• response to John(lojbab) on sarcu, Logical Language Group
• TECH: Two non-English based lujvo requests, Nick Nicholas
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: Two non-English based lujvo requests, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TECH: Two non-English based lujvo requests, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: Two non-English based lujvo requests, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: Two non-English based lujvo requests, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: Two non-English based lujvo requests, ucleaar
  • Re: TECH: Two non-English based lujvo requests, Nick Nicholas
  • TECH: Two non-English based lujvo requests, Mark E. Shoulson
• GEN: Ed de jour concept as I see it, Nick Nicholas
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: GEN: Ed de jour concept as I see it, Logical Language Group
  • Re: GEN: Ed de jour concept as I see it, Nick Nicholas
• TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu, jimc
  • Re: TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: long, but major topic: lean lujvo and fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
• TECH: local unit gismu, hierarchical place structures, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: local unit gismu, hierarchical place structures, Jorge Llambias
• Re: local units, species hierarchy, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: local units, species hierarchy, Logical Language Group
• Re: local units, Jorge Llambias
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: local units, Logical Language Group
  • Re: local units, Chris Handley
  • Re: local units, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: local units, Logical Language Group
  • Re: local units, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: local units, Logical Language Group
  • Re: local units, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: local units, Logical Language Group
• more Eaton, anyone?, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: more Eaton, anyone?, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: more Eaton, anyone?, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: more Eaton, anyone?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: more Eaton, anyone?, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: more Eaton, anyone?, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: more Eaton, anyone?, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: more Eaton, anyone?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: more Eaton, anyone?, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: more Eaton, anyone?, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: more Eaton, anyone?, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: more Eaton, anyone?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: more Eaton, anyone?, ucleaar
• GEN: Nick incommunicado during October, Nick Nicholas
• Re: Subcategorisation (Was :response to John(lojbab) on sarcu), Colin Fine
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Subcategorisation (Was :response to John(lojbab) on sarcu), Logical Language Group
• Re: degrees vrs radians, Logical Language Group
• New "jutsi" (species) proposal, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: New "jutsi" (species) proposal, ucleaar
• Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, ucleaar
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Art Protin
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Chris Handley
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, ucleaar
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Art Protin
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, ucleaar
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, ucleaar
  • Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Iain Alexander
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Art Protin
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, ucleaar
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Iain Alexander
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Art Protin
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Art Protin
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Art Protin
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, ucleaar
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Iain Alexander
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Iain Alexander
  • Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
• Subcategorisation, Colin Fine
• Essay on Subcategorization, Colin Fine
• Re: deleting places, Robert J. Chassell
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: deleting places, Art Protin
  • Re: deleting places, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: deleting places, ucleaar
  • Re: deleting places, ucleaar
  • Re: deleting places, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: deleting places, Art Protin
  • Re: deleting places, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: deleting places, jimc
• >6 place brivla, ucleaar
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: >6 place brivla, Logical Language Group
• Re: >6 place brivla, fat gismu, deleting ..., Jon Wolfe
• No Subject, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • No Subject, ucleaar
  • No Subject, Art Protin
  • No Subject, Logical Language Group
  • No Subject, Logical Language Group
  • No Subject, Logical Language Group
  • No Subject, Logical Language Group
  • No Subject, Logical Language Group
  • No Subject, Dr. C.D. Wright
• Re: vehicle/means places on various gismu, litru vs. klama, Jorge LLambias
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: vehicle/means places on various gismu, litru vs. klama, Logical Language Group
• litru and klama, Logical Language Group
• Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Iain Alexander
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Iain Alexander
  • Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Iain Alexander
  • Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, jimc
  • Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu, Logical Language Group
• Re: means/vehicle, Jorge LLambias
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: means/vehicle, Art Protin
  • Re: means/vehicle, Logical Language Group
  • Re: means/vehicle, Art Protin
  • Re: means/vehicle, Logical Language Group
• coming and going, Logical Language Group
• more on fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: more on fat gismu, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: more on fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: more on fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: more on fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: more on fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: more on fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: more on fat gismu, ucleaar
  • Re: more on fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: more on fat gismu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: more on fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
• TEXT: toldi nunsenva, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TEXT: toldi nunsenva, Colin Fine
  • Re: TEXT: toldi nunsenva, Iain Alexander
  • Re: TEXT: toldi nunsenva, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TEXT: toldi nunsenva, Nick Nicholas
• TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Colin Fine
  • Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu, Nick Nicholas
• Lojban to TLI Loglan correspondences available on ftp, Logical Language Group
• TECH: muvdu place structure, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: muvdu place structure, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: muvdu place structure, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: muvdu place structure, Iain Alexander
• TECH: jarco place structure, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: jarco place structure, Nick Nicholas
• TECH: misc transitive place structure issues, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: misc transitive place structure issues, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: misc transitive place structure issues, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TECH: misc transitive place structure issues, Logical Language Group
• PHILOSOPHY/TECH: place structures and metaphysical parsimony, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: PHILOSOPHY/TECH: place structures and metaphysical parsimony, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: PHILOSOPHY/TECH: place structures and metaphysical parsimony, Robert J. Chassell
• TECH: deagentive place structures, ucleaar
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: deagentive place structures, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TECH: deagentive place structures, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: deagentive place structures, ucleaar
  • Re: TECH: deagentive place structures, ucleaar
  • Re: TECH: deagentive place structures, Jorge LLambias
• news from TLI (colored by the Lojban point-of-view), Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: news from TLI (colored by the Lojban point-of-view), Bruce Gilson
  • Re: news from TLI (colored by the Lojban point-of-view), Logical Language Group
• rely, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: rely, Bruce Gilson
  • Re: rely, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: rely, ucleaar
  • Re: rely, Jorge LLambias
• Intransitives, Colin Fine
• Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Art Protin
  • Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Art Protin
  • Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Jorge Llambias
  • Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Chris Handley
  • Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Chris Handley
  • Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: "philosophy" (was: toldi nunsenva), Nick Nicholas
• Some questions about the text, Glyn Gowing
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Some questions about the text, Logical Language Group
• ADMIN: Charge cards, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: ADMIN: Charge cards, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ADMIN: Charge cards, ucleaar
• ADMIN: New Lojban Parser Policy - Parser available on ftp, Logical Language Group
• LEXICON: Programming jargon, Logical Language Group
• TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, jimc
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Art Protin
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: (attention Ivan!) demonstrative predicate cmavo needed?, Logical Language Group
• ADMIN: Lojban parser available, FTP site reorganized, Logical Language Group
• Possible problem with Lojban parser source, Logical Language Group
• Compiling the Lojban parser, Robert J. Chassell
• Event contours and ZAhO tcita, Mark E. Shoulson
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Event contours and ZAhO tcita, Art Protin
  • Re: Event contours and ZAhO tcita, Logical Language Group
• Converse of tu'a/ demonstratives, Colin Fine
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Converse of tu'a/ demonstratives, Jorge Llambias
• Re: Animal gaits, ucleaar
• Re: "science" defined, Robert J. Chassell
• TECH: nested bridi anaphora, Nick Nicholas
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: nested bridi anaphora, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: nested bridi anaphora, ucleaar
  • Re: TECH: nested bridi anaphora, Colin Fine
  • Re: TECH: nested bridi anaphora, Logical Language Group
• TEXT: ze skami se finti lisri, Nick Nicholas
• TECH: Topic constructions and prenexes, Nick Nicholas
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: Topic constructions and prenexes, Logical Language Group
• beginner questions: the lord's prayer, Chris Bogart
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: beginner questions: the lord's prayer, Logical Language Group
• beginner question: the lord's prayer, Chris Bogart
• TECH: lujvo : tutuear, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: lujvo : tutuear, Nick Nicholas
• response to And - old posting culture-specifcity, Logical Language Group
• TECH: panra/simsa, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: panra/simsa, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: TECH: panra/simsa, Colin Fine
• TEXT: Lojbab bau la lojban .ue, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TEXT: Lojbab bau la lojban .ue, Colin Fine
  • Re: TEXT: Lojbab bau la lojban .ue, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TEXT: Lojbab bau la lojban .ue, Colin Fine
  • Re: TEXT: Lojbab bau la lojban .ue, Jorge Llambias
• TECH: more on panra and only, Logical Language Group
• TECH: query re. jvajvo for "nu zei broda", ucleaar
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: query re. jvajvo for "nu zei broda", Nick Nicholas
• Re: {cikre} as fat gismu, Robert J. Chassell
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: {cikre} as fat gismu, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: {cikre} as fat gismu, Logical Language Group
• Re: {sorcu} definition, Robert J. Chassell
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Colin Fine
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Logical Language Group
  • Re: {sorcu} definition, Jorge LLambias
• Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language, Matthew Faupel
  • Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language, ucleaar
  • Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language, Art Protin
  • Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Bus boys: two nations divided by a common language, Logical Language Group
• Long 5-parter coming, Logical Language Group
• TECH: My semantics essay, Nick Nicholas
• sorry about unnumbered postings., Logical Language Group
• TECH.LING: Lojban glottochronology, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH.LING: Lojban glottochronology, Logical Language Group
• TECH: more thoughts on zi'o, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o, Colin Fine
  • Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o, Richard Kennaway
  • TECH: more thoughts on zi'o, Art Protin
  • Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o, Art Protin
  • Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o, ucleaar
  • Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o, Richard Kennaway
  • Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o, jimc
  • Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o, Art Protin
  • Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o, Colin Fine
  • Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o, Art Protin
  • Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o, Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: more thoughts on zi'o, ucleaar
  • TECH: more thoughts on zi'o, Ivan A Derzhanski
• GEN: Nick back on line, Nick Nicholas
• re'enai, Colin Fine
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: re'enai, Logical Language Group
  • Re: re'enai, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: re'enai, Jorge LLambias
  • Re: re'enai, Colin Fine
  • Re: re'enai, Jorge LLambias
• Re: another new query (ketco), Jorge LLambias
• Eaton, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Eaton, Nick Nicholas
  • Re: Eaton, Jorge LLambias
• TECH: proposed new rVV attitudinal classifier, Logical Language Group
• TECH: re'enai and the emotion classifiers (long), Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TECH: re'enai and the emotion classifiers (long), Art Protin
  • Re: TECH: re'enai and the emotion classifiers (long), Jorge LLambias
  • Re: TECH: re'enai and the emotion classifiers (long), Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: re'enai and the emotion classifiers (long), Art Protin
  • Re: TECH: re'enai and the emotion classifiers (long), Art Protin
  • Re: TECH: re'enai and the emotion classifiers (long), Logical Language Group
  • Re: TECH: re'enai and the emotion classifiers (long), Art Protin
  • Re: TECH: re'enai and the emotion classifiers (long), Art Protin
• sprituality; new cmavo, Logical Language Group
• Re: re'e, Robert J. Chassell
• TEXT: This Is the Title of This Story..., Nick Nicholas
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TEXT: This Is the Title of This Story..., Colin Fine
• response on old posting - lujvo-making TECH/PHILOSOPHY (long), Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: response on old posting - lujvo-making TECH/PHILOSOPHY (long), Jorge Llambias
  • Re: response on old posting - lujvo-making TECH/PHILOSOPHY (long), Logical Language Group
  • Re: response on old posting - lujvo-making TECH/PHILOSOPHY (long), Jorge Llambias
• another response on old posting - lujvo-making, Logical Language Group
• Re: dog-house for lapdogs, Robert J. Chassell
• proposal for new member of SE, ucleaar
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: proposal for new member of SE, Colin Fine
  • Re: proposal for new member of SE, David Eric Young
  • Re: proposal for new member of SE, ucleaar
  • Re: proposal for new member of SE, Logical Language Group
  • Re: proposal for new member of SE, ucleaar
  • Re: proposal for new member of SE, Logical Language Group
  • Re: proposal for new member of SE, Logical Language Group
  • Re: proposal for new member of SE, Colin Fine
  • Re: proposal for new member of SE, ucleaar
  • Re: proposal for new member of SE, Colin Fine
  • Re: proposal for new member of SE, Logical Language Group
  • Re: proposal for new member of SE, ucleaar
  • Re: proposal for new member of SE, Logical Language Group
• TECH: tu'e/tu'u, Logical Language Group
• ADMIN: draft textbook available by anon FTP, Logical Language Group
• better formatted lessons, Robert J. Chassell
• TEXT: le firgai be la xunrynunmorsi, Jorge Llambias
• response to your technical questions from last month, Logical Language Group
• Change of Address Notification, Nick NICHOLAS
• The return of the ZAhO, Jorge Llambias
• Re: your mail, Logical Language Group