Re: whiskey lovers

[ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>]

Lojbab: 
> As of the July 94 abstraction paper and all my understandings, "ka" has
> never had more than one place.  

Check your records for a baselined cmavo list dated 6.1.93. 

> You can understand "Beauty" is the abstract (ka melbi) without knowing
> to what specific "possessor" that abstract is being applied - indeed

*specific* is the key word.  If something is a property it is a property
of something - there is always an x2, even if it is filled by zohe. 

> Beauty is supposed to be indepednent of the things that are beautiful.
> LIkewise "Faith, Hope, Chaarity.  WE have no trouble understanding these
> without case studies.  Why not Whiskeyfondnesss?

The possessor of beauty in general is all the possessors.

---
And