Re: Qs: VhVhV & PAPAMEI &c.

[Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>]

coi. .and.

> (3) Given that (i-ii) are synonymous ("Not every person's a man")
>
> i.    na nanmu fa ro prenu
> ii.   ro prenu cu na nanmu
>
>       ["Every person is not a man" = {ro prenu na ku nanmu}]

Surely this is saying that all people are not men, that is there does not
exist a person who is a man. :-)

Perhaps,

    .i na nanmu fa da poi prenu
    .i da poi prenu cu na nanmu

> I'd have thought iii-iv shd also be synonymous
>
> iii.  koa ba klama pu ku
> iv.   pu ku koa ba klama
>
> But according to the tense paper iii-iv differ. Is there a
> rationale to this?

As for your actual question - loi temci valsi cu mutce leka cfipu be mi

co'o mi'e dn.