Re: rel clause paper

di'e se cusku la .and.

> Is it legitimate for one to ask for a means of doing what I
> asked about? {la djon tumclax} is not a solution, since, as you
> say, it may be not understood, as with "John Cowan", or it may
> be wrongly understood, as with "Noburo Takeshita" (I forget what
> exactly the first name was).

Well, with my proposed reading of "me" (or even without it, really)
you can say:

	la me la djan. tumclaxu

which means "The one named 'The one named "John" type-of land-lacker".
Suit?

-- 
John Cowan					cowan@ccil.org
		e'osai ko sarji la lojban.