ba'e (was: kau)

[John Cowan <cowan@DRV.CBC.COM>]

la lojbab. cusku di'e

> The problem with ba'e appearing afterwards is that it is ambiguous as to
> interactions with other attitudinals.  Would klama ba'e .ui mean that
> we were emphasizing and happy about klama, or that we were emphasizing
> klama and happy about the fact that we were emphasizing it.

But attitudinals in general already have this problem: see
Chapter 13, Example 19.1 (p. 312 in hard copy).

--
John Cowan      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@ccil.org
                        e'osai ko sarji la lojban