Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Lojban book is now out!, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Lojban book is now out!, Logical Language Group
• Tones was: Re: NGL: Proposal: Syllabic and Word Structure, Pytr Klark
• Onomatopoeia! where the words come sweeping 'cross the clang...., Harding, George E.
• Re: Word order types, JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON
  • Re: Word order types, Pytr Klark
• Re: Onomatopoeia! where the words come sweeping 'cross the clang...., BRAD COON
• Re: Ideophones in conlangs?, Cliff Crawford
• Re: UNESCO RED BOOK ON ENDANGERED LANGUAGES: EUROPE, Tapani Salminen
• International signed books have gone out, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: International signed books have gone out, Logical Language Group
  • International signed books have gone out, John Cowan
• Re: category errors in sumti, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • category errors in sumti, Logical Language Group
  • Re: category errors in sumti, And Rosta
  • Re: category errors in sumti, Logical Language Group
  • Re: category errors in sumti, John Cowan
  • Re: category errors in sumti, Logical Language Group
  • Re: category errors in sumti, And Rosta
  • Re: category errors in sumti, Robin Turner
  • Re: category errors in sumti, Jim Carter
• Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Jim Carter
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Anonymous
  • whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Logical Language Group
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
    • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Chris Bogart
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Logical Language Group
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Logical Language Group
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
    • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Carl Burke
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Logical Language Group
    • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Carl Burke
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Logical Language Group
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Carl Burke
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Logical Language Group
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Carl Burke
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Jorge J. Llambías
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Jorge J. Llambías
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
    • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
• Re: Watch your language, please., Nik Taylor
• Re: The CONLANG cheat-sheet, Ferenc Valoczy
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: The CONLANG cheat-sheet, Logical Language Group
• Re: CHAT: The CONLANG cheat-sheet, James Campbell
• NGL: Grand cross-check (Section 1), Jack Durst
• RLR magazine update., Robert J. Petry
• I hope you are catching up, Logical Language Group
• Re: Un-phonetic conlang, And Rosta
• Re: demonstrating my ignorance, John Cowan
• Re: Problems with Abstraction, Colin Fine
• Domestic signed copies mailed, John Cowan
• Re: xor questions, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: xor questions, Jorge J. Llambías
  • Re: xor questions, Jorge J. Llambías
  • Re: xor questions, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • Re: xor questions, Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: xor questions, Jorge J. Llambías
  • Re: xor questions, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
• Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lo, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lo, And Rosta
  • Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lo, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lo, And Rosta
  • Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lo, Jorge J. Llambías
  • Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lo, Logical Language Group
  • Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lo, Jorge J. Llambías
  • Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lo, Logical Language Group
  • Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lo, Logical Language Group
  • Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lo, Jorge J. Llambías
  • Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lo, Jorge J. Llambías
  • Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lo, Logical Language Group
    • Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lo, John Cowan
  • Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lo, Jorge J. Llambías
  • Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lo, Jorge J. Llambías
  • Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lo, Logical Language Group
  • Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lo, Logical Language Group
  • Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lo, Logical Language Group
  • Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lo, Logical Language Group
  • Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lo, Jorge J. Llambías
  • Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lo, Logical Language Group
• Re: Books, Logical Language Group
• Re: bad news on the books, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • bad news on the books, Logical Language Group
  • Re: bad news on the books, Logical Language Group
• Re: dacti, Logical Language Group
• Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, And Rosta
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, And Rosta
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, And Rosta
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, And Rosta
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, And Rosta
    • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, John Cowan
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, John Cowan
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, Robin Turner
  • Re: ni, jei, perfectionism, Logical Language Group
• Re: GLI Re: do all nu's happen?, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • GLI Re: do all nu's happen?, And Rosta
• Re: GLI Re: Indirect questions, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • GLI Re: Indirect questions, And Rosta
  • Re: GLI Re: Indirect questions, And Rosta
  • Re: GLI Re: Indirect questions, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: GLI Re: Indirect questions, Logical Language Group
  • Re: GLI Re: Indirect questions, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: GLI Re: Indirect questions, And Rosta
  • Re: GLI Re: Indirect questions, And Rosta
  • Re: GLI Re: Indirect questions, And Rosta
    • Re: GLI Re: Indirect questions, John Cowan
  • Re: GLI Re: Indirect questions, John Cowan
  • Re: GLI Re: Indirect questions, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: GLI Re: Indirect questions, And Rosta
• Re: kau, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: kau, And Rosta
    • Re: kau, John Cowan
    • Re: kau, Anonymous
  • Re: kau, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • Re: kau, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: kau, And Rosta
  • Re: kau, Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: kau, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: kau, Logical Language Group
    • ba'e (was: kau), John Cowan
• lojban electronic dictionary, Steven Belknap
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: lojban electronic dictionary, Veijo Vilva
• irony markers, Steven Belknap
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: irony markers, Logical Language Group
• Re: universe of discourse, bob
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: universe of discourse, And Rosta
  • Re: universe of discourse, bob
• Re: Brain weirdness, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Brain weirdness, Mark E. Shoulson
    • Re: Brain weirdness, John Cowan
  • Re: Brain weirdness, Chris Bogart
  • Re: Brain weirdness, Chris Bogart
  • Re: Brain weirdness, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: Brain weirdness, Logical Language Group
• chrestomathy, Robin Turner
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: chrestomathy, bob
• Re: gaffs, Robin Turner
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: gaffs, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: gaffs, Robin Turner
• Re: 5 year old's language, Logical Language Group
• GLI Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: GLI Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: GLI Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, And Rosta
  • Re: GLI Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, And Rosta
• GLI nu, dacti, And Rosta
• Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, Mark E. Shoulson
    • Types and tokens (was: What the ...), John Cowan
• Re: logical gaffs, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: logical gaffs, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: logical gaffs, Robin Turner
  • Re: logical gaffs, Steven Belknap
  • Re: logical gaffs, Chris Bogart
  • Re: logical gaffs, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
• GLI xu lei ci valsi cu valsi?, And Rosta
• GLI zo/bacru, And Rosta
• Re: reply to And #1, And Rosta
• Re: reply to And #2, And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: reply to And #2, Rick Nylander
  • Re: reply to And #2, Logical Language Group
  • Re: reply to And #2, Logical Language Group
• Re: reply to And #3, And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: reply to And #3, Logical Language Group
  • Re: reply to And #3, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: reply to And #3, Logical Language Group
  • Re: reply to And #3, Chris Bogart
  • Re: reply to And #3, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: reply to And #3, Logical Language Group
  • Re: reply to And #3, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
• On Lojban, And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: On Lojban, Logical Language Group
  • Re: On Lojban, Logical Language Group
  • Re: On Lojban, And Rosta
  • Re: On Lojban, And Rosta
• Re: Lojbab on lojban list (Was: Re: reply to And #3), Chris Bogart
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Lojbab on lojban list (Was: Re: reply to And #3), And Rosta
  • Re: Lojbab on lojban list (Was: Re: reply to And #3), Rick Nylander
  • Re: Lojbab on lojban list (Was: Re: reply to And #3), Carl Burke
  • Re: Lojbab on lojban list (Was: Re: reply to And #3), And Rosta
  • Re: Lojbab on lojban list (Was: Re: reply to And #3), Rick Nylander
  • Re: Lojbab on lojban list (Was: Re: reply to And #3), Carl Burke
• Re: toxic memes, Robin Turner
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: toxic memes, Robin Turner
• Beginners, Robin Turner
• Domains of Discourse and lo mlatu, Thanatos
• Subject: Re: GLI Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Subject: Re: GLI Re: What the *%$@ does "nu" mean?, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
• Are tanru really metaphors?, Ronald Hale-Evans
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Are tanru really metaphors?, bob
  • Re: Are tanru really metaphors?, Ronald Hale-Evans
  • Re: Are tanru really metaphors?, bob
  • Re: Are tanru really metaphors?, Logical Language Group
• On logji lojbo discussions, And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: On logji lojbo discussions, Logical Language Group
  • Re: On logji lojbo discussions, And Rosta
  • Re: On logji lojbo discussions, Logical Language Group
  • Re: On logji lojbo discussions, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: On logji lojbo discussions, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: On logji lojbo discussions, Logical Language Group
  • Re: On logji lojbo discussions, And Rosta
• semisummary: countability, And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: semisummary: countability, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: semisummary: countability, Logical Language Group
  • Re: semisummary: countability, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: semisummary: countability, And Rosta
  • Re: semisummary: countability, And Rosta
  • Re: semisummary: countability, Logical Language Group
  • Re: semisummary: countability, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: semisummary: countability, And Rosta
  • Re: semisummary: countability, And Rosta
  • Re: semisummary: countability, Logical Language Group
  • Re: semisummary: countability, And Rosta
• psychotherapeutic lojban, And Rosta
  • Re: psychotherapeutic lojban, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: psychotherapeutic lojban, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
• partial instantiations (was: Re: GLI Re: do all nu's happen?), And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: partial instantiations (was: Re: GLI Re: do all nu's happen?), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
    • CAha (was: partial instantiations), John Cowan
  • Re: partial instantiations (was: Re: GLI Re: do all nu's happen?), Logical Language Group
• Re: Is Lojban important?, And Rosta
• truthvalues (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: truthvalues (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), bob
  • Re: truthvalues (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: truthvalues (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), bob
• more on nu (was Re: reply to And #1), And Rosta
• Re: splitting list, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
• From the cheering section ;-), Rick Nylander
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: From the cheering section ;-), Logical Language Group
• Carl Burke's question, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Carl Burke's question, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: Carl Burke's question, Carl Burke
  • Re: Carl Burke's question, Carl Burke
  • Re: Carl Burke's question, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: Carl Burke's question, Carl Burke
  • Re: Carl Burke's question, Chris Bogart
  • Re: Carl Burke's question, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
• kennings - reprint of Jl10 articles on Lojban poetry, Logical Language Group
• Some reduced price copies of the Lojban refgram available, Logical Language Group
• ca'a/pu'i, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: ca'a/pu'i, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ca'a/pu'i, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
• ba'e, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
• Re: kennings, Chris Bogart
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: kennings, Chris Bogart
  • Re: kennings, Robin Turner
  • Re: kennings, Thanatos
  • Re: kennings, Logical Language Group
• Re: cold logic (was "re:kennings"), Chris Bogart
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • cold logic (was "re:kennings"), Robin Turner
• Re: beginner's question, Chris Bogart
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: beginner's question, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • beginner's question, Robin Turner
  • Re: beginner's question, Logical Language Group
• Problem fixed (maybe), Logical Language Group
• Re: flowers (was: "beginner's question"), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • flowers (was: "beginner's question"), Robin Turner
• Beginner question on meaning of "le ... xu ku" and "le ... ku xu", Thanatos
• CAha (was: partial instantiations), John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: CAha (was: partial instantiations), And Rosta
    • Re: CAha (was: partial instantiations), John Cowan
  • Re: CAha (was: partial instantiations), John Cowan
• ba'e (was: kau), John Cowan
• Re: partial instantiations (was: Re: GLI Re: do all nu's ha, And Rosta
• Re: cold logic, Robin Turner
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: cold logic, bob
• Re: Beginner question on meaning of "le ... xu ku" and "le ... ku xu", Chris Bogart
• Lojban text production (RE: ni, jei, perfectionism), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Lojban text production (RE: ni, jei, perfectionism), Chris Bogart
  • Re: Lojban text production (RE: ni, jei, perfectionism), Logical Language Group
  • Re: Lojban text production (RE: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: Lojban text production (RE: ni, jei, perfectionism), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
• Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lojbo discussions), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lojbo discussions), And Rosta
  • Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lojbo discussions), Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lojbo discussions), Jim Carter
  • Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lojbo discussions), And Rosta
  • Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lojbo discussions), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
• Re: flowers (was "re: beginner's question"), Logical Language Group
• Logical connectives and questions (and: Re: Beginner question on meaning of "le ... xu ku" and "le ... ku xu"), Thanatos
• xi, kennings, jvajvo (was Re: Are tanru really metaphors?), And Rosta
  • Re: xi, kennings, jvajvo (was Re: Are tanru really metaphors?), John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: xi, kennings, jvajvo (was Re: Are tanru really metaphors?), John Cowan
• Re: Beginner question on meaning of "le ... xu ku" and "le ..., And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Beginner question on meaning of "le ... xu ku" and "le ..., Thanatos
• Q-less kau (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: Q-less kau (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Q-less kau (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
  • Re: Q-less kau (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Logical Language Group
• papilionine, Ronald Hale-Evans
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: papilionine, And Rosta
• le vofli tapla, Chris Bogart
  • Re: le vofli tapla, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: le vofli tapla, John Cowan
  • Re: le vofli tapla, And Rosta
• Re: whether, Robin Turner
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: whether, Matthew Faupel
  • Re: whether, And Rosta
  • Re: whether, Robin Turner
  • Re: whether, And Rosta
• Re: xi, kennings, jvajvo, And Rosta
• Lists, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Lists, And Rosta
  • Re: Lists, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Lists, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Lists, And Rosta
  • Re: Lists, Logical Language Group
• Turkish proverbs, Robin Turner
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Turkish proverbs, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: Turkish proverbs, Chris Bogart
  • Re: Turkish proverbs, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: Turkish proverbs, Logical Language Group
• Re: Beginner question on meaning of "le ... xu ku" and "le, And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Beginner question on meaning of "le ... xu ku" and "le, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
• Books on their way!, Logical Language Group
• indirect questions (was : ni, jei....), And Rosta
• Bite me?, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Bite me?, Carl Burke
• on du'u (delayed rtesponse), Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: on du'u (delayed rtesponse), And Rosta
• ka'e, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: ka'e, And Rosta
  • Re: ka'e, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: ka'e, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ka'e, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ka'e, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: ka'e, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: ka'e, Logical Language Group
• la'e, Logical Language Group
  • Re: la'e, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: la'e, And Rosta
  • Re: la'e, John Cowan
  • Re: la'e, Logical Language Group
  • Re: la'e, Logical Language Group
  • Re: la'e, And Rosta
  • Re: la'e, Logical Language Group
    • Re: la'e, John Cowan
  • Re: la'e, And Rosta
  • Re: la'e, And Rosta
  • Re: la'e, Logical Language Group
  • Re: la'e, Logical Language Group
  • Re: la'e, And Rosta
  • Re: la'e, And Rosta
• Re: Turkish, Robin Turner
• Re: Carl's Burke's question, Robin Turner
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Carl's Burke's question, Logical Language Group
• debating style and attitudinals, Robin Turner
  • Re: debating style and attitudinals, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: debating style and attitudinals, John Cowan
  • Re: debating style and attitudinals, Chris Bogart
  • Re: debating style and attitudinals, Robin Turner
  • Re: debating style and attitudinals, Logical Language Group
  • Re: debating style and attitudinals, And Rosta
  • Re: debating style and attitudinals, Logical Language Group
• Turkish proverb 3, Robin Turner
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Turkish proverb 3, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: Turkish proverb 3, Chris Bogart
  • Re: Turkish proverb 3, Robin Turner
• For And's pleasure, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: For And's pleasure, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: For And's pleasure, And Rosta
  • Re: For And's pleasure, Logical Language Group
  • Re: For And's pleasure, And Rosta
  • Re: For And's pleasure, Logical Language Group
  • Re: For And's pleasure, And Rosta
• Another Lojbanic geographic cluster, Logical Language Group
• trying to settle {nu}, And Rosta
• xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lojbo discu, And Rosta
  • Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lojbo discu, John Cowan
• multiple ce`u (was: Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: multiple ce`u (was: Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
• Re: The design of Lojban, Colin Fine
• Re: Dvorak (& Lojban), Colin Fine
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Dvorak (& Lojban), bob
• Re: multiple ce`u (was: Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei,, And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: multiple ce`u (was: Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei,, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: multiple ce`u (was: Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei,, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: multiple ce`u (was: Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei,, And Rosta
  • Re: multiple ce`u (was: Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei,, Logical Language Group
  • Re: multiple ce`u (was: Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei,, And Rosta
  • Re: multiple ce`u (was: Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei,, Jorge J. Llambías
  • Re: multiple ce`u (was: Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei,, Logical Language Group
  • Re: multiple ce`u (was: Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei,, Logical Language Group
• ze'u tcidu lei notci, Colin Fine
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: ze'u tcidu lei notci, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
• Re: Linguistics journals, Colin Fine
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: linguistics journals, Robin Turner
  • Re: linguistics journals, Colin Fine
  • Re: linguistics journals, Robin Turner
  • Re: linguistics journals, Colin Fine
• Re: xor questions (was Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lojbo discu, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
• QWERTY, Colin Fine
• Re: Ironic Use of Attitudinals, Colin Fine
• ce'u, Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: ce'u, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: ce'u, And Rosta
• Re: wants and needs, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • wants and needs, Robin Turner
  • Re: wants and needs, Jorge J. Llambías
  • Re: wants and needs, Rick Nylander
  • Re: wants and needs, Chris Bogart
  • Re: wants and needs, Robin Turner
• Re: First message, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • First message, David Barton
  • Re: First message, Chris Bogart
• Gismu data base for the PalmPilot, David Barton
• djuno and ce'u, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: djuno and ce'u, And Rosta
    • Re: djuno and ce'u, John Cowan
  • Re: djuno and ce'u, Logical Language Group
  • Re: djuno and ce'u, And Rosta
  • Re: djuno and ce'u, Logical Language Group
  • Re: djuno and ce'u, Steven Belknap
  • Re: djuno and ce'u, Robin Turner
• xu broda, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: xu broda, And Rosta
• te kancu le'i nu'o se tcidu, Colin Fine
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: te kancu le'i nu'o se tcidu, Chris Bogart
• The Book, Julian Pardoe
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: The Book, Logical Language Group
  • The book, Rick Nylander
  • Re: The book, Ashley Yakeley
• Book misprints, anyone?, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Book misprints, anyone?, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • Re: Book misprints, anyone?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Book misprints, anyone?, Mark E. Shoulson
• Re: Set Theory Woes, Jorge J. Llambías
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Set Theory Woes, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Set Theory Woes, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Set Theory Woes, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Set Theory Woes, Ashley Yakeley
  • Re: Set Theory Woes, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Set Theory Woes, Ashley Yakeley
• Re: knowledge and belief, Jorge J. Llambías
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • knowledge and belief, Robin Turner
  • Re: knowledge and belief, Jorge J. Llambías
  • Re: knowledge and belief, Logical Language Group
  • Re: knowledge and belief, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • Re: knowledge and belief, Logical Language Group
  • Re: knowledge and belief, Chris Bogart
  • Re: knowledge and belief, Jorge J. Llambías
  • Re: knowledge and belief, Logical Language Group
  • Re: knowledge and belief, bob
  • Re: knowledge and belief, Jorge J. Llambías
  • Re: knowledge and belief, Jorge J. Llambías
  • Re: knowledge and belief, Steven Belknap
  • Re: knowledge and belief, Chris Bogart
  • Re: knowledge and belief, Jorge J. Llambías
  • Re: knowledge and belief, Logical Language Group
  • Re: knowledge and belief, Robin Turner
  • Re: knowledge and belief, Steven Belknap
  • Re: knowledge and belief, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Knowledge and Belief, Rob Zook
  • Re: Knowledge and Belief, Mark Vines
• functions, Robin Turner
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: functions, Logical Language Group
  • Re: functions, Robin Turner
  • Re: functions, Logical Language Group
  • Re: functions, Logical Language Group
• Re: functions (zo'o), Jorge J. Llambías
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: functions (zo'o), Robin Turner
  • Re: functions (zo'o), Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: functions (zo'o), Jorge J. Llambías
  • Re: functions (zo'o), Chris Bogart
  • Re: functions (zo'o), Logical Language Group
• Greetings!, Pycyn
• Adjectives, Andrew Sieber
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Adjectives, Pycyn
• lu lo'e gerku poi srana la jocun. li'u, Ashley Yakeley
• Do you know what I know, in your palace warm, mighty king?, Steven Belknap
• Re: seitu'a le krefu te rinsa, Jorge J. Llambías
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • seitu'a le krefu te rinsa, Mark Vines
  • Re: seitu'a le krefu te rinsa, Chris Bogart
• Re: Ali kicked the dog repeatedly, Chris Bogart
• Re: Knowledge & Belief, Jorge J. Llambías
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Knowledge & Belief, Jorge J. Llambías
  • Knowledge & Belief, Steven Belknap
  • Re: Knowledge & Belief, Ashley Yakeley
  • Knowledge & Belief, Steven Belknap
  • Re: Knowledge & Belief, Steven Belknap
  • Re: Knowledge & Belief, Rob Zook
  • Re: Knowledge & Belief, Rob Zook
• Re: <djuno> & <xusra> (Was Knowledge & Belief), Jorge J. Llambías
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • <djuno> & <xusra> (Was Knowledge & Belief), Steven Belknap
• No Subject, Jorge J. Llambías
• erratum, Robin Turner
• Re: <djuno> & howabout <krici>? (Was Knowledge & Belief), Rob Zook