Re: debating style and attitudinals

[Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>]

>[ta'o] peppering text with attitudinals, discursives etc. might be a =
good
>idea overall

.i'ecai ba'a people may be more likely to take the time to look up and =
learn some words if they're sprinkled through English text, and they can =
read enough of it to interest them in looking up the remaining words.  =
An english text with 10 lojban words in it may be less intimidating than =
a 10-word Lojban text, although reading it will teach vocabulary without =
grammar.

>if And, in one of his
>characteristically vitriolic postings, were to write [le'uro'u] instead =
of
>[le'uro'e]!).  And whatever the rights and wrongs of it, [pe'u] no =
ironic
>attitudinals!

.ua .u'udai zo'o While exhorting others not to make errors, you've made =
the error of replacing le'o with le'u in both examples -- which happens =
to be the end-error-quote. =20

chris